Test that we really do move spills down to the dominator of
all the uses.

Also add a test where go1.8 would have moved the spill out of
the loop into two exit points, but go1.9 doesn't move the spill.
This is a case where the 1.9 spill moving code does not subsume
the 1.8 spill moving code.

Maybe we resurrect moving-spills-out-of-loops CL to fix this one.
(I suspect it wouldn't be worth the effort, but would be happy
to hear evidence otherwise.)

Update #20472

Change-Id: I7dbf8d65e7f4d675d14e5ecf502887cebda35d2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44038
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>