Commit 7179c1ac authored by Robert Griesemer's avatar Robert Griesemer

Revert "go/printer: support for printing alias declarations"

This reverts commit 59c63c71.

Reason: Decision to back out current alias implementation.

For #16339.

Change-Id: Idd135fe84b7ce4814cb3632f717736fc6985634c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32822Reviewed-by: 's avatarChris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
parent 26e43779
......@@ -1309,26 +1309,13 @@ func keepTypeColumn(specs []ast.Spec) []bool {
}
}
i0 := -1 // if i0 >= 0 we are in a run and i0 is the start of the run
var keepType bool // valid if we are in a run (i0 >= 0)
i0 := -1 // if i0 >= 0 we are in a run and i0 is the start of the run
var keepType bool
for i, s := range specs {
var hasValues, hasType bool
switch t := s.(type) {
case *ast.AliasSpec:
// like a ValueSpec with values (alias origin), but no type
hasValues = true
case *ast.ValueSpec:
hasValues = len(t.Values) > 0
hasType = t.Type != nil
default:
panic("internal error: unexpected ast.Spec")
}
if hasValues {
t := s.(*ast.ValueSpec)
if t.Values != nil {
if i0 < 0 {
// start of a run with values
// start of a run of ValueSpecs with non-nil Values
i0 = i
keepType = false
}
......@@ -1339,7 +1326,7 @@ func keepTypeColumn(specs []ast.Spec) []bool {
i0 = -1
}
}
if hasType {
if t.Type != nil {
keepType = true
}
}
......@@ -1351,25 +1338,6 @@ func keepTypeColumn(specs []ast.Spec) []bool {
return m
}
func (p *printer) aliasSpec(s *ast.AliasSpec, keepTypeCol bool) {
p.setComment(s.Doc)
p.expr(s.Name)
extraTabs := 3
if keepTypeCol {
p.print(vtab)
extraTabs--
}
p.print(vtab, token.ALIAS, blank)
p.expr(s.Orig)
extraTabs--
if s.Comment != nil {
for ; extraTabs > 0; extraTabs-- {
p.print(vtab)
}
p.setComment(s.Comment)
}
}
func (p *printer) valueSpec(s *ast.ValueSpec, keepType bool) {
p.setComment(s.Doc)
p.identList(s.Names, false) // always present
......@@ -1453,17 +1421,6 @@ func (p *printer) spec(spec ast.Spec, n int, doIndent bool) {
p.setComment(s.Comment)
p.print(s.EndPos)
case *ast.AliasSpec:
p.setComment(s.Doc)
p.expr(s.Name)
if n == 1 {
p.print(blank)
} else {
p.print(vtab)
}
p.print(token.ALIAS, blank)
p.expr(s.Orig)
case *ast.ValueSpec:
if n != 1 {
p.internalError("expected n = 1; got", n)
......@@ -1515,16 +1472,7 @@ func (p *printer) genDecl(d *ast.GenDecl) {
p.linebreak(p.lineFor(s.Pos()), 1, ignore, p.linesFrom(line) > 0)
}
p.recordLine(&line)
switch t := s.(type) {
case *ast.AliasSpec:
p.aliasSpec(t, keepType[i])
case *ast.ValueSpec:
p.valueSpec(t, keepType[i])
default:
p.internalError("unknown ast.Spec type: %T", t)
}
p.valueSpec(s.(*ast.ValueSpec), keepType[i])
}
} else {
var line int
......
......@@ -985,47 +985,3 @@ func _(struct {
x int
y int
}) // no extra comma between } and )
// alias declarations
const c => C
const c => p.C
const (
a = 123
b int = 456
c => foo
ddd => p.Foo
)
// TODO(gri) Currently = and => line up in the formatted output,
// but because = and => have different lengths, the
// text following doesn't line up. Consider putting that
// text into its own column.
const (
a int = iota // a comment
b => p.B // b comment
c // c comment
d => p.C // d comment
e => p.E
f
g float32 = 9.8
)
type c => C
type c => p.C
type (
s struct{}
a => A
ddd => p.Foo
)
var c => C
var c => p.C
var (
a = 123
b int = 456
c => foo
ddd => p.Foo
)
func f => F
func f_long => p.F
......@@ -999,47 +999,3 @@ func _(struct {
x int
y int
}) // no extra comma between } and )
// alias declarations
const c => C
const c => p.C
const (
a = 123
b int = 456
c => foo
ddd => p.Foo
)
// TODO(gri) Currently = and => line up in the formatted output,
// but because = and => have different lengths, the
// text following doesn't line up. Consider putting that
// text into its own column.
const (
a int = iota // a comment
b => p.B // b comment
c // c comment
d => p.C // d comment
e => p.E
f
g float32 = 9.8
)
type c => C
type c => p.C
type (
s struct{}
a => A
ddd => p.Foo
)
var c => C
var c => p.C
var (
a = 123
b int = 456
c => foo
ddd => p.Foo
)
func f => F
func f_long => p.F
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment