Commit 7a05fa8a authored by Shenghou Ma's avatar Shenghou Ma Committed by Minux Ma

doc: fix dead links in FAQ

Fixes #14741.

Change-Id: Idb8de8b0c1059c15e4c3df4a60bbd340d4e74aba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20487Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarAndrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
parent ddc6b644
......@@ -1806,15 +1806,16 @@ Why does Go perform badly on benchmark X?</h3>
<p>
One of Go's design goals is to approach the performance of C for comparable
programs, yet on some benchmarks it does quite poorly, including several
in <a href="/test/bench/shootout/">test/bench/shootout</a>. The slowest depend on libraries
for which versions of comparable performance are not available in Go.
For instance, <a href="/test/bench/shootout/pidigits.go">pidigits.go</a>
in <a href="https://go.googlesource.com/exp/+/master/shootout/">golang.org/x/exp/shootout</a>.
The slowest depend on libraries for which versions of comparable performance
are not available in Go.
For instance, <a href="https://go.googlesource.com/exp/+/master/shootout/pidigits.go">pidigits.go</a>
depends on a multi-precision math package, and the C
versions, unlike Go's, use <a href="http://gmplib.org/">GMP</a> (which is
written in optimized assembler).
Benchmarks that depend on regular expressions
(<a href="/test/bench/shootout/regex-dna.go">regex-dna.go</a>, for instance) are
essentially comparing Go's native <a href="/pkg/regexp">regexp package</a> to
(<a href="https://go.googlesource.com/exp/+/master/shootout/regex-dna.go">regex-dna.go</a>,
for instance) are essentially comparing Go's native <a href="/pkg/regexp">regexp package</a> to
mature, highly optimized regular expression libraries like PCRE.
</p>
......@@ -1822,9 +1823,9 @@ mature, highly optimized regular expression libraries like PCRE.
Benchmark games are won by extensive tuning and the Go versions of most
of the benchmarks need attention. If you measure comparable C
and Go programs
(<a href="/test/bench/shootout/reverse-complement.go">reverse-complement.go</a> is one example), you'll see the two
languages are much closer in raw performance than this suite would
indicate.
(<a href="https://go.googlesource.com/exp/+/master/shootout/reverse-complement.go">reverse-complement.go</a>
is one example), you'll see the two languages are much closer in raw performance
than this suite would indicate.
</p>
<p>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment