Commit aad29eba authored by Brad Fitzpatrick's avatar Brad Fitzpatrick

sort: fix a slice benchmark not using the stable variant, add another

Change-Id: I9783d8023d453a72c4605a308064bef98168bcb8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30360Reviewed-by: 's avatarIan Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
parent ee8ec429
......@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ func BenchmarkStableInt1K_Slice(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
copy(data, unsorted)
b.StartTimer()
Slice(data, func(i, j int) bool { return data[i] < data[j] })
SliceStable(data, func(i, j int) bool { return data[i] < data[j] })
b.StopTimer()
}
}
......@@ -263,6 +263,19 @@ func BenchmarkSortInt64K(b *testing.B) {
}
}
func BenchmarkSortInt64K_Slice(b *testing.B) {
b.StopTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
data := make([]int, 1<<16)
for i := 0; i < len(data); i++ {
data[i] = i ^ 0xcccc
}
b.StartTimer()
Slice(data, func(i, j int) bool { return data[i] < data[j] })
b.StopTimer()
}
}
func BenchmarkStableInt64K(b *testing.B) {
b.StopTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment