Commit ab14797f authored by Michal Bohuslávek's avatar Michal Bohuslávek Committed by Robert Griesemer

go/printer: fix indentation of *ast.CallExpr parameters

The current version of go/printer formats the following code
like this:

	foo.Bar().
		Run(func() {
		do()
	}).
		Set(map[string]interface{}{
		"x": "three",
		"y": 4,
	}).
		Run(
		func() {
			do()
		},
	)

This CL changes the go/printer behaviour to make the code look
like this.

	foo.Bar().
		Run(func() {
			do()
		}).
		Set(map[string]interface{}{
			"x": "three",
			"y": 4,
		}).
		Run(
			func() {
				do()
			},
		)

Fixes #12066.

Change-Id: If0f525dae1a5d45f9ba40534dbb65715d7e8001b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13928Reviewed-by: 's avatarRobert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
parent 67ddae87
......@@ -747,13 +747,7 @@ func (p *printer) expr1(expr ast.Expr, prec1, depth int) {
}
case *ast.SelectorExpr:
p.expr1(x.X, token.HighestPrec, depth)
p.print(token.PERIOD)
if line := p.lineFor(x.Sel.Pos()); p.pos.IsValid() && p.pos.Line < line {
p.print(indent, newline, x.Sel.Pos(), x.Sel, unindent)
} else {
p.print(x.Sel.Pos(), x.Sel)
}
p.selectorExpr(x, depth, false)
case *ast.TypeAssertExpr:
p.expr1(x.X, token.HighestPrec, depth)
......@@ -802,13 +796,14 @@ func (p *printer) expr1(expr ast.Expr, prec1, depth int) {
if len(x.Args) > 1 {
depth++
}
var wasIndented bool
if _, ok := x.Fun.(*ast.FuncType); ok {
// conversions to literal function types require parentheses around the type
p.print(token.LPAREN)
p.expr1(x.Fun, token.HighestPrec, depth)
wasIndented = p.possibleSelectorExpr(x.Fun, token.HighestPrec, depth)
p.print(token.RPAREN)
} else {
p.expr1(x.Fun, token.HighestPrec, depth)
wasIndented = p.possibleSelectorExpr(x.Fun, token.HighestPrec, depth)
}
p.print(x.Lparen, token.LPAREN)
if x.Ellipsis.IsValid() {
......@@ -821,6 +816,9 @@ func (p *printer) expr1(expr ast.Expr, prec1, depth int) {
p.exprList(x.Lparen, x.Args, depth, commaTerm, x.Rparen)
}
p.print(x.Rparen, token.RPAREN)
if wasIndented {
p.print(unindent)
}
case *ast.CompositeLit:
// composite literal elements that are composite literals themselves may have the type omitted
......@@ -891,6 +889,30 @@ func (p *printer) expr1(expr ast.Expr, prec1, depth int) {
return
}
func (p *printer) possibleSelectorExpr(expr ast.Expr, prec1, depth int) bool {
if x, ok := expr.(*ast.SelectorExpr); ok {
return p.selectorExpr(x, depth, true)
}
p.expr1(expr, prec1, depth)
return false
}
// selectorExpr handles an *ast.SelectorExpr node and returns whether x spans
// multiple lines.
func (p *printer) selectorExpr(x *ast.SelectorExpr, depth int, isMethod bool) bool {
p.expr1(x.X, token.HighestPrec, depth)
p.print(token.PERIOD)
if line := p.lineFor(x.Sel.Pos()); p.pos.IsValid() && p.pos.Line < line {
p.print(indent, newline, x.Sel.Pos(), x.Sel)
if !isMethod {
p.print(unindent)
}
return true
}
p.print(x.Sel.Pos(), x.Sel)
return false
}
func (p *printer) expr0(x ast.Expr, depth int) {
p.expr1(x, token.LowestPrec, depth)
}
......
......@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ func _() {
// handle multiline argument list correctly
_ = new(T).
foo(
1).
1).
foo(2)
_ = new(T).foo(
......@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ func _() {
Blob.(*Type).
Slices[1:4].
Method(1, 2,
3).
3).
Thingy
_ = a.b.c
......@@ -684,3 +684,21 @@ func _() {
_ = (func(x int) float)(nil)
_ = (func() func() func())(nil)
}
func _() {
_ = f().
f(func() {
f()
}).
f(map[int]int{
1: 2,
3: 4,
})
_ = f().
f(
func() {
f()
},
)
}
......@@ -713,3 +713,21 @@ func _() {
_ = (func(x int)(float))(nil)
_ = (func() func() func()())(nil)
}
func _() {
_ = f().
f(func() {
f()
}).
f(map[int]int{
1: 2,
3: 4,
})
_ = f().
f(
func() {
f()
},
)
}
......@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ func _() {
// handle multiline argument list correctly
_ = new(T).
foo(
1).
1).
foo(2)
_ = new(T).foo(
......@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ func _() {
Blob.(*Type).
Slices[1:4].
Method(1, 2,
3).
3).
Thingy
_ = a.b.c
......@@ -684,3 +684,21 @@ func _() {
_ = (func(x int) float)(nil)
_ = (func() func() func())(nil)
}
func _() {
_ = f().
f(func() {
f()
}).
f(map[int]int{
1: 2,
3: 4,
})
_ = f().
f(
func() {
f()
},
)
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment