Commit b1fab099 authored by Rob Pike's avatar Rob Pike

cmd/vet: fix a couple of minor word choices in README

No semantic change, just clarifying a bit by choosing better words
in a couple of places.

Change-Id: I4496062ee7909baf83d4d22d25e13ef93b358b4b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55255Reviewed-by: 's avatarIan Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
parent 67c36059
Vet is a tool that checks correctness of Go programs. It runs a suite of tests, Vet is a tool that checks correctness of Go programs. It runs a suite of tests,
each tailored to check for a particular class of errors. Examples include incorrect each tailored to check for a particular class of errors. Examples include incorrect
Printf format verbs or malformed build tags. Printf format verbs and malformed build tags.
Over time many checks have been added to vet's suite, but many more have been Over time many checks have been added to vet's suite, but many more have been
rejected as not appropriate for the tool. The criteria applied when selecting which rejected as not appropriate for the tool. The criteria applied when selecting which
...@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ checks to add are: ...@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ checks to add are:
Correctness: Correctness:
Vet's tools are about correctness, not style. A vet check must identify real or Vet's checks are about correctness, not style. A vet check must identify real or
potential bugs that could cause incorrect compilation or execution. A check that potential bugs that could cause incorrect compilation or execution. A check that
only identifies stylistic points or alternative correct approaches to a situation only identifies stylistic points or alternative correct approaches to a situation
is not acceptable. is not acceptable.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment