Commit ddcb975f authored by Alex Brainman's avatar Alex Brainman

internal/poll: remove allocation in windows FD.Writev

Use closure parameter instead of external variable to
remove 1 allocation.

I tried to add test, but it is difficult to add something simple
and not flake here. I did test this with:

diff --git a/src/net/writev_test.go b/src/net/writev_test.go
index 4c05be4..e417d68 100644
--- a/src/net/writev_test.go
+++ b/src/net/writev_test.go
@@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ func TestBuffers_WriteTo(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }

+func TestBuffers_WriteToAllocs(t *testing.T) {
+	allocs := testing.AllocsPerRun(10, func() {
+		testBuffer_writeTo(t, 10, false)
+	})
+	if allocs > 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("got %v; want 0", allocs)
+	}
+}
+
 func testBuffer_writeTo(t *testing.T, chunks int, useCopy bool) {
 	oldHook := poll.TestHookDidWritev
 	defer func() { poll.TestHookDidWritev = oldHook }()

It makes allocation count go down by 1 after the fix.

Before:

C:\>u:\test -test.v -test.run=WriteToAllocs
=== RUN   TestBuffers_WriteToAllocs
--- FAIL: TestBuffers_WriteToAllocs (0.05s)
        writev_test.go:107: got 66; want 0
FAIL

and after:

C:\>u:\test -test.v -test.run=WriteToAllocs
=== RUN   TestBuffers_WriteToAllocs
--- FAIL: TestBuffers_WriteToAllocs (0.04s)
        writev_test.go:107: got 65; want 0
FAIL

Thanks to @MichaelMonashev for report and the fix.

Fixes #19222

Change-Id: I0f73cd9e2c8bbaa0653083f81f3ccb83b5ea84e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42893Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
parent 45d42fdc
......@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ func (fd *FD) Writev(buf *[][]byte) (int64, error) {
o := &fd.wop
o.InitBufs(buf)
n, err := wsrv.ExecIO(o, "WSASend", func(o *operation) error {
return syscall.WSASend(o.fd.Sysfd, &o.bufs[0], uint32(len(*buf)), &o.qty, 0, &o.o, nil)
return syscall.WSASend(o.fd.Sysfd, &o.bufs[0], uint32(len(o.bufs)), &o.qty, 0, &o.o, nil)
})
o.ClearBufs()
TestHookDidWritev(n)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment