Skip to content

G
golang
Switch branch/tag
  1. 05 Apr, 2017 16 commits
  3. 29 Mar, 2017 1 commit
    • Brad Fitzpatrick's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] net, net/http: adjust time-in-past constant even earlier · e35c01b4
      Brad Fitzpatrick authored 
      The aLongTimeAgo time value in net and net/http is used to cancel
in-flight read and writes. It was set to time.Unix(233431200, 0)
which seemed like far enough in the past.

But Raspberry Pis, lacking a real time clock, had to spoil the fun and
boot in 1970 at the Unix epoch time, breaking assumptions in net and
net/http.

So change aLongTimeAgo to time.Unix(1, 0), which seems like the
earliest safe value. I don't trust subsecond values on all operating
systems, and I don't trust the Unix zero time. The Raspberry Pis do
advance their clock at least. And the reported problem was that Hijack
on a ResponseWriter hung forever, waiting for the connection read
operation to finish. So now, even if kernel + userspace boots in under
a second (unlikely), the Hijack will just have to wait for up to a
second.

Updates #19747
Fixes #19771 (backport to Go 1.8.x)

Change-Id: Id59430de2e7b5b5117d4903a788863e9d344e53a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38785
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit e83fc2e44336423dab94bfe74fad4c4e6a4703b3)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38786Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
      e35c01b4
  5. 27 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  7. 25 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  9. 23 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  11. 16 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  13. 09 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  15. 08 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  17. 03 Mar, 2017 3 commits
    • Cherry Zhang's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] cmd/compile: do not fold offset into load/store for args on ARM64 · 2327d696
      Cherry Zhang authored 
      Args may be not at 8-byte aligned offset to SP. When the stack
frame is large, folding the offset of args may cause large
unaligned offsets that does not fit in a machine instruction on
ARM64. Therefore disable folding offsets for args.

This has small performance impact (see below). A better fix would
be letting the assembler backend fix up the offset by loading it
into a register if it doesn't fit into an instruction. And the
compiler can simply generate large load/stores with offset. Since
in most of the cases the offset is aligned or the stack frame is
small, it can fit in an instruction and no fixup is needed. But
this is too complicated for Go 1.8.

name                     old time/op    new time/op    delta
BinaryTree17-8              8.30s ± 0%     8.31s ± 0%    ~     (p=0.579 n=10+10)
Fannkuch11-8                6.14s ± 0%     6.18s ± 0%  +0.53%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
FmtFprintfEmpty-8           117ns ± 0%     117ns ± 0%    ~     (all equal)
FmtFprintfString-8          196ns ± 0%     197ns ± 0%  +0.72%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfInt-8             204ns ± 0%     205ns ± 0%  +0.49%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
FmtFprintfIntInt-8          302ns ± 0%     307ns ± 1%  +1.46%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-8     329ns ± 2%     326ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.083 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfFloat-8           540ns ± 0%     542ns ± 0%  +0.46%  (p=0.000 n=8+7)
FmtManyArgs-8              1.20µs ± 1%    1.19µs ± 1%  -1.02%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GobDecode-8                17.3ms ± 1%    17.8ms ± 0%  +2.75%  (p=0.000 n=10+7)
GobEncode-8                15.3ms ± 1%    15.4ms ± 0%  +0.57%  (p=0.004 n=9+10)
Gzip-8                      789ms ± 0%     803ms ± 0%  +1.78%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gunzip-8                    128ms ± 0%     130ms ± 0%  +1.73%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HTTPClientServer-8          202µs ± 6%     201µs ±10%    ~     (p=0.739 n=10+10)
JSONEncode-8               42.0ms ± 0%    42.1ms ± 0%  +0.19%  (p=0.028 n=10+9)
JSONDecode-8                159ms ± 0%     161ms ± 0%  +1.05%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Mandelbrot200-8            10.1ms ± 0%    10.1ms ± 0%  -0.07%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
GoParse-8                  8.46ms ± 1%    8.61ms ± 1%  +1.77%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-8       227ns ± 1%     226ns ± 0%  -0.35%  (p=0.001 n=10+9)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-8      1.63µs ± 0%    1.63µs ± 0%  -0.13%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-8       250ns ± 0%     249ns ± 0%  -0.40%  (p=0.001 n=8+9)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-8      2.07µs ± 0%    2.08µs ± 0%  +0.05%  (p=0.027 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-8      350ns ± 0%     350ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.412 n=9+8)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-8      104µs ± 0%     104µs ± 0%  +0.31%  (p=0.000 n=10+7)
RegexpMatchHard_32-8       5.82µs ± 0%    5.82µs ± 0%    ~     (p=0.937 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-8        176µs ± 0%     176µs ± 0%  +0.03%  (p=0.000 n=9+8)
Revcomp-8                   1.36s ± 1%     1.37s ± 1%    ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)
Template-8                  151ms ± 1%     156ms ± 1%  +3.21%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
TimeParse-8                 737ns ± 0%     758ns ± 2%  +2.74%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
TimeFormat-8                801ns ± 2%     789ns ± 1%  -1.51%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
[Geo mean]                  142µs          143µs       +0.50%

Fixes #19137.

Change-Id: Ib8a21ea98c0ffb2d282a586535b213cc163e1b67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37251
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDavid Chase <drchase@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6464e5dc)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37719Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
      2327d696
    • Cherry Zhang's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] cmd/compile: check both syms when folding address into load/store on ARM64 · ba48d200
      Cherry Zhang authored 
      The rules for folding addresses into load/stores checks sym1 is
not on stack (because the stack offset is not known at that point).
But sym1 could be nil, which invalidates the check. Check merged
sym instead.

Fixes #19137.

Change-Id: I8574da22ced1216bb5850403d8f08ec60a8d1005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37145
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDavid Chase <drchase@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3557d546)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37214
      ba48d200
    • Cherry Zhang's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] cmd/compile: add zero-extension before right shift when lowering Lrot on ARM · b43fabfb
      Cherry Zhang authored 
      Fixes #19270.

Change-Id: Ie7538ff8465138a8bc02572e84cf5d00de7bbdd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37718
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDavid Chase <drchase@google.com>
      b43fabfb
  19. 02 Mar, 2017 2 commits
  21. 27 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  23. 23 Feb, 2017 2 commits
  25. 16 Feb, 2017 3 commits
    • Chris Broadfoot's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] go1.8 · cd6b6202
      Chris Broadfoot authored 
      Change-Id: If1e38f02db86449abd4c8a57988d9825b1cf2511
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37132
Run-TryBot: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
      cd6b6202
    • Chris Broadfoot's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] doc: document go1.8 · 606eb9b0
      Chris Broadfoot authored 
      Change-Id: Ie2144d001c6b4b2293d07b2acf62d7e3cd0b46a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37130Reviewed-by: 's avatarRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37131
      606eb9b0
    • Russ Cox's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] runtime: do not call wakep from enlistWorker, to avoid possible deadlock · bcda91c1
      Russ Cox authored 
      We have seen one instance of a production job suddenly spinning to
100% CPU and becoming unresponsive. In that one instance, a SIGQUIT
was sent after 328 minutes of spinning, and the stacks showed a single
goroutine in "IO wait (scan)" state.

Looking for things that might get stuck if a goroutine got stuck in
scanning a stack, we found that injectglist does:

	lock(&sched.lock)
	var n int
	for n = 0; glist != nil; n++ {
		gp := glist
		glist = gp.schedlink.ptr()
		casgstatus(gp, _Gwaiting, _Grunnable)
		globrunqput(gp)
	}
	unlock(&sched.lock)

and that casgstatus spins on gp.atomicstatus until the _Gscan bit goes
away. Essentially, this code locks sched.lock and then while holding
sched.lock, waits to lock gp.atomicstatus.

The code that is doing the scan is:

	if castogscanstatus(gp, s, s|_Gscan) {
		if !gp.gcscandone {
			scanstack(gp, gcw)
			gp.gcscandone = true
		}
		restartg(gp)
		break loop
	}

More analysis showed that scanstack can, in a rare case, end up
calling back into code that acquires sched.lock. For example:

	runtime.scanstack at proc.go:866
	calls runtime.gentraceback at mgcmark.go:842
	calls runtime.scanstack$1 at traceback.go:378
	calls runtime.scanframeworker at mgcmark.go:819
	calls runtime.scanblock at mgcmark.go:904
	calls runtime.greyobject at mgcmark.go:1221
	calls (*runtime.gcWork).put at mgcmark.go:1412
	calls (*runtime.gcControllerState).enlistWorker at mgcwork.go:127
	calls runtime.wakep at mgc.go:632
	calls runtime.startm at proc.go:1779
	acquires runtime.sched.lock at proc.go:1675

This path was found with an automated deadlock-detecting tool.
There are many such paths but they all go through enlistWorker -> wakep.

The evidence strongly suggests that one of these paths is what caused
the deadlock we observed. We're running those jobs with
GOTRACEBACK=crash now to try to get more information if it happens
again.

Further refinement and analysis shows that if we drop the wakep call
from enlistWorker, the remaining few deadlock cycles found by the tool
are all false positives caused by not understanding the effect of calls
to func variables.

The enlistWorker -> wakep call was intended only as a performance
optimization, it rarely executes, and if it does execute at just the
wrong time it can (and plausibly did) cause the deadlock we saw.

Comment it out, to avoid the potential deadlock.

Fixes #19112.
Unfixes #14179.

Change-Id: I6f7e10b890b991c11e79fab7aeefaf70b5d5a07b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37093
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarAustin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37022
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
      bcda91c1
  27. 15 Feb, 2017 2 commits
    • Sarah Adams's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] doc: update Code of Conduct wording and scope · 7d7a0a9d
      Sarah Adams authored 
      This change removes the punitive language and anonymous reporting mechanism
from the Code of Conduct document. Read on for the rationale.

More than a year has passed since the Go Code of Conduct was introduced.
In that time, there have been a small number (<30) of reports to the Working Group.
Some reports we handled well, with positive outcomes for all involved.
A few reports we handled badly, resulting in hurt feelings and a bad
experience for all involved.

On reflection, the reports that had positive outcomes were ones where the
Working Group took the role of advisor/facilitator, listening to complaints and
providing suggestions and advice to the parties involved.
The reports that had negative outcomes were ones where the subject of the
report felt threatened by the Working Group and Code of Conduct.

After some discussion among the Working Group, we saw that we are most
effective as facilitators, rather than disciplinarians. The various Go spaces
already have moderators; this change to the CoC acknowledges their authority
and places the group in a purely advisory role. If an incident is
reported to the group we may provide information to or make a
suggestion the moderators, but the Working Group need not (and should not) have
any authority to take disciplinary action.

In short, we want it to be clear that the Working Group are here to help
resolve conflict, period.

The second change made here is the removal of the anonymous reporting mechanism.
To date, the quality of anonymous reports has been low, and with no way to
reach out to the reporter for more information there is often very little we
can do in response. Removing this one-way reporting mechanism strengthens the
message that the Working Group are here to facilitate a constructive dialogue.

Change-Id: Iee52aff5446accd0dae0c937bb3aa89709ad5fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37014Reviewed-by: 's avatarAndrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37040Reviewed-by: 's avatarChris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
      7d7a0a9d
    • Russ Cox's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.8] encoding/xml: fix incorrect indirect code in chardata,… · cedc511a
      Russ Cox authored 
      [release-branch.go1.8] encoding/xml: fix incorrect indirect code in chardata, comment, innerxml fields

The new tests in this CL have been checked against Go 1.7 as well
and all pass in Go 1.7, with the one exception noted in a comment
(an intentional change to omitempty already present before this CL).

CL 15684 made the intentional change to omitempty.
This CL fixes bugs introduced along the way.

Most of these are corner cases that are arguably not that important,
but they've always worked all the way back to Go 1, and someone
cared enough to file #19063. The most significant problem found
while adding tests is that in the case of a nil *string field with
`xml:",chardata"`, the existing code silently stops processing not just
that field but the entire remainder of the struct.
Even if #19063 were not worth fixing, this chardata bug would be.

Fixes #19063.

Change-Id: I318cf8f9945e1a4615982d9904e109fde577ebf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36954
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDaniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 72aa757d)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37016
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarIan Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>
      cedc511a
  29. 13 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  31. 10 Feb, 2017 3 commits