- 24 Nov, 2015 16 commits
-
-
Carlos Cirello authored
Change-Id: I9e968c03c6615a539b18701c84f830898242441d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13926Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Aaron Jacobs authored
Change-Id: Idd9523949ee4f2f304b12be39f8940ba34a420be Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16361Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Caleb Spare authored
Before, we reset the timer at the end of T.Parallel, which is okay assuming that T.Parallel is the first thing in the test. Snapshot the elapsed time at the beginning of Parallel and include it in the total duration so that any time spent in the test before calling Parallel is reported in the test duration as well. Updates #12243. Change-Id: Ieca553e1f801e16b9b6416463fa8f7fa65425185 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16989Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
dvyukov authored
These tests were failing on one of the versions of cl/9345 ("runtime: simplify buffered channels"). Change-Id: I920ffcd28de428bcb7c2d5a300068644260e1017 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16416Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Ilya Tocar authored
Results are a bit noisy, but show good improvement (haswell) name old time/op new time/op delta Memclr5-48 6.06ns ± 8% 5.65ns ± 8% -6.81% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Memclr16-48 5.75ns ± 6% 5.71ns ± 6% ~ (p=0.545 n=20+19) Memclr64-48 6.54ns ± 5% 6.14ns ± 9% -6.12% (p=0.000 n=18+20) Memclr256-48 10.1ns ±12% 9.9ns ±14% ~ (p=0.285 n=20+19) Memclr4096-48 104ns ± 8% 57ns ±15% -44.98% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Memclr65536-48 2.45µs ± 5% 2.43µs ± 8% ~ (p=0.665 n=16+20) Memclr1M-48 58.7µs ±13% 56.4µs ±11% -3.92% (p=0.033 n=20+19) Memclr4M-48 233µs ± 9% 234µs ± 9% ~ (p=0.728 n=20+19) Memclr8M-48 469µs ±11% 472µs ±16% ~ (p=0.947 n=20+20) Memclr16M-48 947µs ±10% 916µs ±10% ~ (p=0.050 n=20+19) Memclr64M-48 10.9ms ±10% 4.5ms ± 9% -58.43% (p=0.000 n=20+20) GoMemclr5-48 3.80ns ±13% 3.38ns ± 6% -11.02% (p=0.000 n=20+20) GoMemclr16-48 3.34ns ±15% 3.40ns ± 9% ~ (p=0.351 n=20+20) GoMemclr64-48 4.10ns ±15% 4.04ns ±10% ~ (p=1.000 n=20+19) GoMemclr256-48 7.75ns ±20% 7.88ns ± 9% ~ (p=0.227 n=20+19) name old speed new speed delta Memclr5-48 826MB/s ± 7% 886MB/s ± 8% +7.32% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Memclr16-48 2.78GB/s ± 5% 2.81GB/s ± 6% ~ (p=0.550 n=20+19) Memclr64-48 9.79GB/s ± 5% 10.44GB/s ±10% +6.64% (p=0.000 n=18+20) Memclr256-48 25.4GB/s ±14% 25.6GB/s ±12% ~ (p=0.647 n=20+19) Memclr4096-48 39.4GB/s ± 8% 72.0GB/s ±13% +82.81% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Memclr65536-48 26.6GB/s ± 6% 27.0GB/s ± 9% ~ (p=0.517 n=17+20) Memclr1M-48 17.9GB/s ±12% 18.5GB/s ±11% ~ (p=0.068 n=20+20) Memclr4M-48 18.0GB/s ± 9% 17.8GB/s ±14% ~ (p=0.547 n=20+20) Memclr8M-48 17.9GB/s ±10% 17.8GB/s ±14% ~ (p=0.947 n=20+20) Memclr16M-48 17.8GB/s ± 9% 18.4GB/s ± 9% ~ (p=0.050 n=20+19) Memclr64M-48 6.19GB/s ±10% 14.87GB/s ± 9% +140.11% (p=0.000 n=20+20) GoMemclr5-48 1.31GB/s ±10% 1.48GB/s ± 6% +13.06% (p=0.000 n=19+20) GoMemclr16-48 4.81GB/s ±14% 4.71GB/s ± 8% ~ (p=0.341 n=20+20) GoMemclr64-48 15.7GB/s ±13% 15.8GB/s ±11% ~ (p=0.967 n=20+19) Change-Id: I393f3f20e2f31538d1b1dd70d6e5c201c106a095 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16773 Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Klaus Post <klauspost@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
Dave Cheney authored
Fixes #11959 Fixes #12035 Skip the CallbackGC test on linux/arm. This test takes between 30 and 60 seconds to run by itself, and is run 4 times over the course of ./run.bash (once during the runtime test, three times more later in the build). Change-Id: I4e7d3046031cd8c08f39634bdd91da6e00054caf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14485Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Alex Brainman authored
Original code is mistakenly panics on VirtualAlloc failure - we want it to go looking for smaller memory region that VirtualAlloc will succeed to allocate. Also return immediately if VirtualAlloc succeeds. See rsc comment on issue #12587 for details. I still don't have a test for this. So I can only hope that this Fixes #12587 Change-Id: I052068ec627fdcb466c94ae997ad112016f734b7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17169Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
See https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/17047/ for the bug fix. Change-Id: Id5b0a37439d0f8f1e668f7c2ac84335b37f3a300 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17177Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
Fixes #13073 Change-Id: I4fd9c6c61f1b9d49f66816839ca35209b4147ae3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17167Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Get rid of residue after removing old parser. Change-Id: I0dace1037d50959071a082c276f9f374eef6edb2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17179 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Caleb Spare authored
It relates to an obsolete notion of 'skipped-but-okay' tests. Fixes #12394 Change-Id: Ib7e6444dc8565e1390bd42d65d30fac136593f78 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17000 Run-TryBot: Caleb Spare <cespare@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <shurcool@gmail.com>
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
These are methods that are "obviously" going to get inlined -- until you build with -l, when they can trigger a stack split at a bad time. Fixes #11482 Change-Id: Ia065c385978a2e7fe9f587811991d088c4d68325 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17165 Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Commit bbd1a1c7 prevented SIGPROF from scanning stacks that were being copied, but it didn't prevent a stack copy (specifically a stack shrink) from happening while SIGPROF is scanning the stack. As a result, a stack copy may adjust stack barriers while SIGPROF is in the middle of scanning a stack, causing SIGPROF to panic when it detects an inconsistent stack barrier. Fix this by taking the stack barrier lock while adjusting the stack. In addition to preventing SIGPROF from scanning this stack, this will block until any in-progress SIGPROF is done scanning the stack. For 1.5.2. Fixes #13362. Updates #12932. Change-Id: I422219c363054410dfa56381f7b917e04690e5dd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17191 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Alex Brainman authored
Calling timeBeginPeriod changes Windows global timer resolution from 15ms to 1ms. This used to improve Go runtime scheduler performance, but not anymore. Thanks to @aclements, scheduler now behaves the same way if we call timeBeginPeriod or not. Remove call to timeBeginPeriod, since it is machine global resource, and there are downsides of using low timer resolution. See issue #8687 for details. Fixes #8687 Change-Id: Ib7e41aa4a81861b62a900e0e62776c9ef19bfb73 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17164Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Yasuhiro MATSUMOTO <mattn.jp@gmail.com> Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
- moved yySymType and token constants (L...) to lex.go - removed oldparser flag and related code - removed go generate that generated y.go Fixes #13240. Change-Id: I2576ec61ee1efe482f2a5132175725c9c02ef977 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17176Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
This relocation is found in libgcc.a in the .eh_frame, and therefore needs to be handled when doing an internal link. Fixes #13375. Change-Id: Idd9e8178e08851a101b43261a30939bcfaf394f9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17173 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
-
- 23 Nov, 2015 9 commits
-
-
Rob Pike authored
It is not important to add, since it's only used for creating an error message, but for consistency in the API between text/template and html/template it should be provided here. The implementation just calls the one in text/template. Fixes #13349. Change-Id: I0882849e06a58f1e38b00eb89d79ac39777309b2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17172Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Introduce a try_ntype function which doesn't return an error upon not finding a type. Use it instead of having separate repeated token checks. Simpler, less code, and more efficient. Change-Id: I81e482158b71901eb179470269349688636aa0ba Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17157Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Rob Pike authored
Change-Id: Icdce5cdb8676c3bcb73bd943b406000252509521 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17174Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Nodir Turakulov authored
Sscanf doc says: Newlines in the input must match newlines in the format. However Sscanf didn't check newline in the end of input (EOF). A test for the case is broken. * check newline in EOF * fix the test * slightly simplify ss.doScanf Fixes #12788 Change-Id: Iaf6b7d81324a72e557543ac22ecea5cecb72e0d6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16165 Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This improves the documentation comment on gcMarkDone, replaces a recursive call with a simple goto, and disables preemption before stopping the world in accordance with the documentation comment on stopTheWorldWithSema. Updates #13363, but, sadly, doesn't fix it. Change-Id: I6cb2a5836b35685bf82f7b1ce7e48a7625906656 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17149Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This improves stack barrier debugging messages in various ways: 1) Rather than printing only the remaining stack barriers (of which there may be none, which isn't very useful), print all of the G's stack barriers with a marker at the position the stack itself has unwound to and a marker at the problematic stack barrier (where applicable). 2) Rather than crashing if we encounter a stack barrier when there are no more stkbar entries, print the same debug message we would if we had encountered a stack barrier at an unexpected location. Hopefully this will help with debugging #12528. Change-Id: I2e6fe6a778e0d36dd8ef30afd4c33d5d94731262 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17147Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
The stack barrier locking functions use a simple cas lock because they need to support trylock, but currently don't increment g.m.locks. This is okay right now because they always run on the system stack or the signal stack and are hence non-preemtible, but this could lead to difficult-to-reproduce deadlocks if these conditions change in the future. Make these functions more robust by incrementing g.m.locks and making them nosplit to enforce non-preemtibility. Change-Id: I73d60a35bd2ad2d81c73aeb20dbd37665730eb1b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17058 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ingo Oeser <nightlyone@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #13344. Change-Id: I33c6721fd33d144c85c87840ddf27ce15aa72328 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17151 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
It started failing on the dragonfly builder at an unrelated commit (one that changed the wording in a few comments in the compiler). Created #13364 to track this. Change-Id: I462880bed8ff565a9950e7e185de97d43999c5e2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17143Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
- 22 Nov, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Dmitri Shuralyov authored
This appears to be an unintended omission. The check func is declared just above, and the err value from template.Parse is captured rather than discarded via blank identifier. All following calls that similarly return err are checked, so it can't be that this example elides error checking for brevity. Finally, if you look at Example_autoescaping, it does check err from template.Parse and its code is very similar. Change-Id: I076e1846302d5f2cdb1d027ed85ca0db85e33ace Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17170Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
- 21 Nov, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Mohit Agarwal authored
Found by cmd/vet Change-Id: I29dd207ecd40fe703054e8ad4e81b3267ca89da2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17160Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
- fix/check location of popdcl calls where questioned - remove unnecessary handling of ... (LDDD) in ntype (couldn't be reached) - inlined and fnret_type and simplified fnres as a consequence - leave handling of ... (LDDD) in arg_list alone (remove TODO) - verify that parser requires a ';' after last statement in a case/default (added test case) Fixes #13243. Change-Id: Iad94b498591a5e85f4cb15bbc01e8e101415560d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17155 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Change-Id: I7c084542996226f3ed464314a5622fcfaac02d61 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17103Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
No code changes. Change-Id: Ibbba7c86007d74b853fb59aa742f87783bd69503 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16541Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
The gccgo bug report https://gcc.gnu.org/PR65785 points out that the multicast listen tests will use the network even with -test.short. Fix test by checking testing.Short with a nil interface. Change-Id: I7eab8df34fe3b78fc376912312fac9d0f94977f1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17154Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
-
- 20 Nov, 2015 9 commits
-
-
Rob Pike authored
Previously it said, "bad verb %% for ...", which is not only wrong, it's ironic as the fix is to use %% rather than % at the end of the string. Diagnose the case where a simple % is at EOF. If there's anything after the percent, the error is already good but this CL also puts quotes around the verb designation ('%d' etc.) to make it even clearer, especially when there is a space involved. Fixes #12315. Change-Id: I31d30659965e940d0bd9ce92a475aab3e2369ef0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17150Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
For #13243. Change-Id: I214945278255a49f93120f9407f536a6c01a29fb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17101Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Use a combination of follow- and stop-token lists and nesting levels to better synchronize parser after a syntax error. Fixes #13319. Change-Id: I9592e0b5b3ba782fb9f9315fea16163328e204f7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17080Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Change-Id: I22a8a233bc157fa09cd0283fcd4bc14d90faed70 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17066Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Minor internal optimization. Change-Id: I229d4a9df3da542b77f830c2830f63ec23ec1d61 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17065Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
This never happens but for pathological input where a BOM sequence is unfinished and ends in EOF (src: "package p\n\nfunc \xef\xef"). No test case added because the /test framework doesn't lend itself easily to it in this case (file must end in EOF rather than comment). Instead, tested manually. Fixes #13268. Change-Id: I049034e6dde7ad884b0a8c329921adac1866ff18 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17047Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Change-Id: If22b8f358e78deca31bd0b1a25e7966987853405 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17083Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This test depends on GODEBUG=gcstackbarrierall, which doesn't work on ppc64. Updates #13334. Change-Id: Ie554117b783c4e999387f97dd660484488499d85 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17120 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
During a crash showing goroutine stacks of all threads (with GOTRACEBACK=crash), it can be that f == nil. Only happens on Solaris; not sure why. Change-Id: Iee2c394a0cf19fa0a24f6befbc70776b9e42d25a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17110Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-