- 24 Oct, 2016 26 commits
-
-
Alexander Döring authored
Fixes #17560 Change-Id: I96fcdec87220391ef5432571b5c090b5be27491a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31771Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Change-Id: I22f0f3e792052762499f632571155768b4052bc9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31759 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Dan Caddigan authored
This is clearer than syscall.EBADF. Fixes #17320. Change-Id: I14c6a362f9a6044c9b07cd7965499f4a83d2a860 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30614 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
\\?\c:\ is a "root directory" that is not subject to further matching, but the ? makes it look like a pattern, which was causing an infinite recursion. Make sure the code understands the ? is not a pattern. Fixes #15879. Change-Id: I3a4310bbc398bcae764b9f8859c875317345e757 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31460Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
RFC 3986 §3.3 disallows relative URL paths in which the first segment contains a colon, presumably to avoid confusion with scheme:foo syntax, which is exactly what happened in #16822. Fixes #16822. Change-Id: Ie4449e1dd21c5e56e3b126e086c3a0b05da7ff24 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31582Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #17181. Change-Id: If7cc4865e391acf76512f7ec7167d5a31377b598 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31574Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: Ic6317f186d0ee68ab1f2d15be9a966a152f61bfb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31610 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixed by CL 31092 already, but that change is a few steps away from the problem observed here, so add an explicit test. Fixes #17019. Change-Id: If4ece1418e6596b1976961347889ce12c5969637 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31466 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
All prior versions of Go have allowed redefining empty templates to become non-empty. Unfortunately, that has never consistently taken effect in html/template after the first execution: // define and execute t := template.New("root") t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}{{end}}<a href="{{template "T"}}">`) t.Execute(w, nil) // <a href=""> // redefine t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}my.url{{end}}`) // succeeds, but ignored t.Execute(w, nil) // <a href=""> When Go 1.6 added {{block...}} to text/template, that loosened the redefinition rules to allow redefinition at any time. The loosening was undone a bit in html/template, although inconsistently: // define and execute t := template.New("root") t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}body{{end}}`) t.Lookup("T").Execute(ioutil.Discard, nil) // attempt to redefine t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}body{{end}}`) // rejected in all Go versions t.Lookup("T").Parse("body") // OK as of Go 1.6, likely unintentionally Like in the empty->non-empty case, whether future execution takes notice of a redefinition basically can't be explained without going into the details of the template escape analysis. Address both the original inconsistencies in whether a redefinition would have any effect and the new inconsistencies about whether a redefinition is allowed by adopting a new rule: no parsing or modifying any templates after the first execution of any template in the same set. Template analysis begins at first execution, and once template analysis has begun, we simply don't have the right logic to update the analysis for incremental modifications (and never have). If this new rule breaks existing uses of templates that we decide need to be supported, we can try to invalidate all escape analysis for the entire set after any modifications. But let's wait on that until we know we need to and why. Also fix documentation of text/template redefinition policy (redefinition is always OK). Fixes #15761. Change-Id: I7d58d7c08a7d9df2440ee0d651a5b2ecaff3006c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31464 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
The Go resolver reports invalid domain name for '!!!.local', but that is allowed by multicast DNS. In general we can't predict what future relaxations might come along, and libc resolvers do not distinguish 'no such host' from 'invalid name', so stop making that distinction here too. Always use 'no such host'. Fixes #12421. Change-Id: I8f22604767ec9e270434e483da52b337833bad71 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31468 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #16959. Change-Id: Ibbb28fdf26c53788a0edb3e3ea54ec030fa2a8cf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31611 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
This is the documented (and now implemented) behavior. Fixes #16841. Change-Id: Ic75adc5ba18303ed9578e04284f32933f905d6a3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31577Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #16564. Change-Id: Idd7b3c8f1d8415acd952d1efb6dc35ba4191805d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31578 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #16657. Change-Id: I9425af91a48016b1d7465b9f43cafa792bc00bb3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31581Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Quentin Smith authored
If a directory in GOPATH is unreadable, we should keep looking for other packages. Otherwise we can give the misleading error "no buildable Go source files". Fixes #16240 Change-Id: I38e1037f56ec463d3c141f0508fb74211cb90f13 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31713 Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes reported by oshimaya (see #13806). Fixes #13806. Change-Id: I9b659ab918a34bc5f7c58f3d7f59058115b7f776 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31651Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #15610. Change-Id: Idbc8a9b328b92034d53b8009471678a166d5cf3f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31588 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
What matters during go get -u is not whether there is an import comment but whether we resolved the path by an HTML <meta> tag. Fixes #16471. Change-Id: I6b194a3f73a7962a0170b4d5cf51cfed74e02c00 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31658 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Maybe the go generate is generating the imports, or maybe there's some other good reason the code is incomplete. The help text already says: Note that go generate does not parse the file, so lines that look like directives in comments or multiline strings will be treated as directives. We'll still reject Go source files that don't begin with a package statement or have a syntax error in the import block, but those are I think more defensible rejections. Fixes #16307. Change-Id: I4f8496c02fdff993f038adfed2df4db7f067dc06 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31659 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
It's always been like this, so document it. Fixes #14351. Change-Id: Ic6a7c44881bac0209fa6863a487fabec5ec0214e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31663 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Avoid crash in the specific case reported in #15201 but also print more useful error message, avoiding slice panic. Fixes #15201. Fixes #16167. Fixes #16566. Change-Id: I66499621e9678a05bc9b12b0da77906cd7027bdd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31665 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Quentin Smith authored
After resizing the scan buffer, we can immediately read into the newly-resized buffer since we know there is now space. Fixes #15712. Change-Id: I56fcfaeb67045ee753a012c37883aa7c81b6e877 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31715 Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Martin Möhrmann authored
According to "Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Optimization Reference Manual" Section: "3.5.1.13 Zero-Latency MOV Instructions" MOV?ZX instructions have zero latency on newer processors. during make.bash: (ANDLconst [0xFF] x) -> (MOVBQZX x) applies 422 times (ANDLconst [0xFFFF] x) -> (MOVWQZX x) applies 114 times Updates #15105 Change-Id: I10933af599de3c26449c52f4b5cd859331028f39 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31639 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com> Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
-
Alex Brainman authored
Makes windows same as others. Change-Id: Ib4651e06d0bd37473ac345d36c91f39aa8f5e662 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31791Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently mspan.isFree technically returns whether the object was not allocated *during this cycle*. Fix it so it actually returns whether or not the object is allocated so the method is more generally useful (especially for debugging). It has one caller, which is carefully written to be insensitive to this distinction, but this lets us simplify this caller. Change-Id: I9d79cf784a56015e434961733093c1d8d03fc091 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30145 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
morestack writes the context pointer to gobuf.ctxt, but since morestack is written in assembly (and has to be very careful with state), it does *not* invoke the requisite write barrier for this write. Instead, we patch this up later, in newstack, where we invoke an explicit write barrier for ctxt. This already requires some subtle reasoning, and it's going to get a lot hairier with the hybrid barrier. Fix this by simplifying the whole mechanism. Instead of writing gobuf.ctxt in morestack, just pass the value of the context register to newstack and let it write it to gobuf.ctxt. This is a normal Go pointer write, so it gets the normal Go write barrier. No subtle reasoning required. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Ia6bf8459bfefc6828f53682ade32c02412e4db63 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31550 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
- 23 Oct, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Alexander Döring authored
Fixes #17159 Change-Id: I44d7081ef7a973dcd1cc2eb7124e3454c94bc6e3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31770Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Hiroshi Ioka authored
Fixes #17504 Change-Id: Ic83578cf2019e5d8778e4b324f04931eb802f603 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31544 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
-
- 22 Oct, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Alex Brainman authored
So errnoErr can be used in other packages. This is something I missed when I sent CL 28990. Fixes #17539 Change-Id: I8ee3b79c4d70ca1e5b29e5b40024f7ae9a86061e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29690Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
This is an alternate solution to https://golang.org/cl/31445 Instead of making NewRequest return a request with Request.Body == nil to signal a zero byte body, add a well-known variable that means explicitly zero. Too many tests inside Google (and presumably the outside world) broke. Change-Id: I78f6ecca8e8aa1e12179c234ccfb6bcf0ee29ba8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31726 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
The test is broken on macOS Sierra. Updates #17463. Change-Id: Ifbb2379c640b9353a01bc55a5cb26dfaad9b4bdc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31725 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
This makes it possible to use URLs with gob. Ideally we'd also implement TextMarshaler and TextUnmarshaler, but that would change the JSON encoding of a URL from something like: {"Scheme":"https","Opaque":"","User":null,"Host":"www.google.com","Path":"/x","RawPath":"","ForceQuery":false,"RawQuery":"y=z","Fragment":""} to something like: "https://www.google.com/x?y=z" That'd be nice, but it would break code expecting the old form. Fixes #10964. Change-Id: I83f06bc2bedd2ba8a5d8eef03ea0056d045c258f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31467Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Adam Langley authored
Now that we have the Clone method on tls.Config, net/http doesn't need any custom functions to do that any more. Change-Id: Ib60707d37f1a7f9a7d7723045f83e59eceffd026 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31595Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Joe Tsai authored
According to the GNU manual, the format is: <<< GNU.sparse.size=size GNU.sparse.numblocks=numblocks repeat numblocks times GNU.sparse.offset=offset GNU.sparse.numbytes=numbytes end repeat >>> The logic in parsePAX converts the repeating sequence of (offset, numbytes) pairs (which is not PAX compliant) into a single comma-delimited list of numbers (which is now PAX compliant). Thus, we validate the following: * The (offset, numbytes) headers must come in the correct order. * The ',' delimiter cannot appear in the value. We do not validate that the value is a parsible decimal since that will be determined later. Change-Id: I8d6681021734eb997898227ae8603efb1e17c0c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31439 Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #16003 Change-Id: I76a8da24b9944647ec40ef2ca4fc93c175ff5a25 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31723Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Text from rsc. Fixes #17093 Change-Id: I13c3018b1584f152b53f8576dd16ebef98aa5182 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31720Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Updates #10767 Change-Id: I197535f71bc2dc45e783f38d8031aa717d50fd80 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31733 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 21 Oct, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Robert Griesemer authored
For -newparser only. Change-Id: I0eaa05035df11734e2bda7ad456b9b30485d9465 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31718Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
Previously, the check to make sure we only considered constant cases for duplicates was skipping past integer ranges, because those use n.List instead of n.Left. Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for investigating and helping to identify the root cause. Fixes #17517. Change-Id: I46fcda8ed9c346ff3a9647d50b83f1555587b740 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31716 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
Fixes #16428. Change-Id: I78d37472e228402bb3c06d7ebd441952386fa38a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31731 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-