- 22 May, 2014 2 commits
-
-
Robert Griesemer authored
The spec was unclear about whether blank methods should be permitted in interface types. gccgo permits at most one, gc crashes if there are more than one, go/types permits at most one. Discussion: Since method sets of non-interface types never contain methods with blank names (blank methods are never declared), it is impossible to satisfy an interface with a blank method. It is possible to declare variables of assignable interface types (but not necessarily identical types) containing blank methods, and assign those variables to each other, but the values of those variables can only be nil. There appear to be two "reasonable" alternatives: 1) Permit at most one blank method (since method names must be unique), and consider it part of the interface. This is what appears to happen now, with corner-case bugs. Such interfaces can never be implemented. 2) Permit arbitrary many blank methods but ignore them. This appears to be closer to the handling of blank identifiers in declarations. However, an interface type literal is not a declaration (it's a type literal). Also, for struct types, blank identifiers are not ignored; so the analogy with declarations is flawed. Both these alternatives don't seem to add any benefit and are likely (if only slightly) more complicated to explain and implement than disallowing blank methods in interfaces altogether. Fixes #6604. LGTM=r, rsc, iant R=r, rsc, ken, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99410046
-
Russ Cox authored
The key property here is what the bit pattern represents, not what its type is. Storing 5 into a pointer is the problem. Storing a uintptr that holds pointer bits back into a pointer is not as much of a problem, and not what we are claiming the runtime will detect. Longer discussion at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/dIGISmr9hw0/0jO4ce85Eh0J LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98370045
-
- 21 May, 2014 18 commits
-
-
Pietro Gagliardi authored
This is a quick documentation change/clarification, as this confused me before: in my own cgo-based projects, I currently have identical #cgo directives in each relevant source file, and I notice with go build -x that cgo is combining the directives, leading to pkg-config invocations with the same package name (gtk+-3.0, in my case) repeated several times, or on Mac OS X, LDFLAGS listing -framework Foundation -framework AppKit multiple times. Since I am about to add a CFLAGS as well, I checked the source to cmd/cgo and go/build (where the work is actually done) to see if that still holds true there. Hopefully other people who have made the same mistake I have (I don't know if anyone has) can remove the excess declarations now; this should make things slightly easier to manage as well. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, gobot, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91520046
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Generated by addca. R=gobot CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/97660043
-
Emil Hessman authored
LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98460045
-
Keith Randall authored
Update #8030 LGTM=rsc R=rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100620045
-
Anthony Martin authored
Ignore symbols that aren't text, data, or bss since they cause problems when dissassembling instructions with small immediate values. Before: build.go:142 0x10ee 83ec50 SUBL $text/template/parse.autotmp_1293(SB), SP After: build.go:142 0x10ee 83ec50 SUBL $0x50, SP Fixes #7947. LGTM=rsc R=rsc, 0intro CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93520045
-
Russ Cox authored
Noted by gri in CL 100660044 review but I missed them. TBR=gri CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/97570049
-
Russ Cox authored
Add larger comment explaining testing methodology, and derive tests arithmetically. (These tests are checking rounding again; the derived tests they replace were checking exact values.) LGTM=r, gri R=gri, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100660044
-
Russ Cox authored
Passes the expanded test in CL 100660044, which gives me some confidence that it might be right. (The old code failed by not considering all the low bits.) LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews, iant, khr https://golang.org/cl/99410051
-
Rob Pike authored
Rewrite formatFloat to be much simpler and clearer and avoid the tricky interaction with padding. The issue refers to complex but the problem is just floating-point. The new tests added were incorrectly formatted before this fix. Fixes #8064. LGTM=jscrockett01, rsc R=rsc, jscrockett01 CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99420048
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #8062. LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91610046
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #7983. LGTM=crawshaw R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw CC=golang-codereviews, rsc https://golang.org/cl/96540044
-
Robert Griesemer authored
LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95480045
-
Robert Griesemer authored
These constants pass go/types constant conversions as well. LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91590047
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #8061. LGTM=crawshaw R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93520046
-
Benny Siegert authored
Patch from http://gnats.NetBSD.org/48811. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, minux.ma, iant CC=golang-codereviews, tk https://golang.org/cl/94670047
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #8032. LGTM=rsc R=rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95580043
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100660043
-
Robert Griesemer authored
The spec did not specify the order in which init() functions are called. Specify that they are called in source order since we have now also specified the initialization order of independent variables. While technically a language change, no existing code could have relied on this, so this should not break anything. Per suggestion from rsc. LGTM=r, iant R=rsc, iant, r, ken CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98420046
-
- 20 May, 2014 20 commits
-
-
Keith Randall authored
Fixes #8051 LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95560046
-
Robert Griesemer authored
- split description of package initialization and program execution - better grouping of concerns in section on package initialization - more explicit definition of what constitues a dependency - removed language about constant dependencies - they are computed at compile-time and not initialized at run-time - clarified that independent variables are initialized in declaration order (rather than reference order) Note that the last clarification is what distinguishes gc and gccgo at the moment: gc uses reference order (i.e., order in which variables are referenced in initialization expressions), while gccgo uses declaration order for independent variables. Not a language change. But adopting this CL will clarify what constitutes a dependency. Fixes #6703. LGTM=adonovan, r, iant, rsc R=r, rsc, iant, ken, adonovan CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99020043
-
Rob Pike authored
LGTM=gri R=gri CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99420045
-
Rob Pike authored
LGTM=minux.ma R=adg, minux.ma CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95540045
-
Shenghou Ma authored
LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93470043
-
Shenghou Ma authored
Fixes #7701. (again, differently) LGTM=rsc R=iant, rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94560043
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
TBR=rsc R=rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98480043
-
Shenghou Ma authored
This idea was rejected in CL 5731059. We should fix the runtime docs instead. ««« original CL description cmd/dist: reflect local changes to tree in goversion runtime.Version() requires a trailing "+" when tree had local modifications at time of build. Fixes #7701 LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/84040045 »»» LGTM=rsc, mra R=iant, rsc, mra CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100520043
-
David du Colombier authored
- Don't export Prog structure. - Remove ProgHeader and ExecTable structures. - Add Magic, Bss and Entry fields in FileHeader. - Replace ?_MAGIC variables with constants. - Ignore final EOF from ReadAt. - Improve documentation. Fixes #7989. LGTM=rsc R=rsc, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91400044
-
Rob Pike authored
Explain which files the go command looks at, and what they represent. Fixes #6348. LGTM=rsc R=rsc, minux.ma CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/96480043
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #7958. LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91590044
-
Russ Cox authored
Add nacl.bash, the NaCl version of all.bash. It's a separate script because it builds a variant of package syscall with a large zip file embedded in it, containing all the input files needed for tests. Disable various tests new since the last round, mostly the ones using os/exec. Fixes #7945. LGTM=dave R=golang-codereviews, remyoudompheng, dave, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100590044
-
Russ Cox authored
I don't know when the bug was fixed, but empirically it was. Make sure it stays fixed by adding a test. Fixes #7884. LGTM=adg R=golang-codereviews, adg CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93500043
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #7050. LGTM=crawshaw, r R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91590043
-
Russ Cox authored
Apparently all the __DWARF sections need addresses even though they are marked as "do not load from disk". Continue the address numbering from the data segment. With this change: g% lldb helloworld Current executable set to 'helloworld' (x86_64). (lldb) b main.main Breakpoint 1: where = helloworld`main.main + 25 at helloworld.go:12, address = 0x0000000000002019 (lldb) r Process 68509 launched: '/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/6l/helloworld' (x86_64) 1 location added to breakpoint 1 (lldb) [KProcess 68509 stopped * thread #1: tid = 0x8b7a27, 0x0000000000002019 helloworld`main.main + 25 at helloworld.go:12, stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 frame #0: 0x0000000000002019 helloworld`main.main + 25 at helloworld.go:12 9 package main 10 11 func main() { -> 12 print("hello, world\n") 13 } (lldb) bt * thread #1: tid = 0x8b7a27, 0x0000000000002019 helloworld`main.main + 25 at helloworld.go:12, stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 * frame #0: 0x0000000000002019 helloworld`main.main + 25 at helloworld.go:12 (lldb) disas helloworld`main.main at helloworld.go:11: 0x2000: movq %gs:0x8a0, %rcx 0x2009: cmpq (%rcx), %rsp 0x200c: ja 0x2015 ; main.main + 21 at helloworld.go:11 0x200e: callq 0x20da0 ; runtime.morestack00_noctxt at atomic_amd64x.c:28 0x2013: jmp 0x2000 ; main.main at helloworld.go:11 0x2015: subq $0x10, %rsp -> 0x2019: leaq 0x2c2e0, %rbx 0x2021: leaq (%rsp), %rbp 0x2025: movq %rbp, %rdi 0x2028: movq %rbx, %rsi 0x202b: movsq 0x202d: movsq 0x202f: callq 0x10300 ; runtime.printstring at compiler.go:1 0x2034: addq $0x10, %rsp 0x2038: ret 0x2039: addb %al, (%rax) 0x203b: addb %al, (%rax) 0x203d: addb %al, (%rax) (lldb) quit Quitting LLDB will kill one or more processes. Do you really want to proceed: [Y/n] y g% Fixes #7070. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93510043
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
Fixes #7835. LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94670044
-
Mikio Hara authored
Update #8030 LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94680043
-
Elias Naur authored
Update #4714 LGTM=iant, minux.ma, rsc R=rsc, iant, r, minux.ma CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100390043
-
Russ Cox authored
The USEFIELD instructions no longer make it to the linker, so we have to do something else to pin the references they were pinning. Emit a 0-length relocation of type R_USEFIELD. Fixes #7486. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews, r https://golang.org/cl/95530043
-
Russ Cox authored
The move from 4kB to 8kB in Go 1.2 was to eliminate many stack split hot spots. The move back to 4kB was predicated on copying stacks eliminating the potential for hot spots. Unfortunately, the fact that stacks do not copy 100% of the time means that hot spots can still happen under the right conditions, and the slowdown is worse now than it was in Go 1.2. There is a real program in issue 8030 that sees about a 30x slowdown: it has a reflect call near the top of the stack which inhibits any stack copying on that segment. Go back to 8kB until stack copying can be used 100% of the time. Fixes #8030. LGTM=khr, dave, iant R=iant, khr, r, bradfitz, dave CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/92540043
-