LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/149280044

The ASN.1 encoding of the CRL Distribution Points extension showed an invalid false 'IsCompound' which caused a display problem in the Windows certificate viewer.

LGTM=agl
R=agl
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/143320043

+ static test

NB: there's a preexisting (dynamic) failure of test issue7978.go.

LGTM=iant
R=rsc, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144650045

This is a minor cleanup following CL 142360043:

The internal parse and format functions in both packages
were almost identical - made them identical by adding an
extra parameter, and documented them as identical.

Eventually we should find a nice way to factor these functions
out, but we cannot do this now while in prep for 1.4.

No functionality change.

LGTM=adonovan
R=adonovan
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/146520043

Bodies larger than 8KB (the default bufio reader size) weren't
being dumped.  Force a read of the body so they're teed into
the response buffer.

Thanks to Steven Hartland for identifying the problem.

Fixes #8089

LGTM=r
R=golang-codereviews, r
CC=adg, golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144650044

Fixes #8541.

LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/153770043

Not a language change.

Several inaccuracies were fixed:

1) A variable declaration may declare more than just one
variable.

2) Variable initialization follows the rules of assignments,
including n:1 assignments. The existing wording implied a 1:1
or n:n rule and generally was somewhat unspecific.

3) The rules for variable declarations with no types and
untyped initialization expressions had minor holes (issue 8088).

4) Clarified the special cases of assignments of untyped values
(we don't just have untyped constants, but also untyped bools,
e.g. from comparisons). The new wording is more direct.

To that end, introduced the notion of an untyped constant's
"default type" so that the same concept doesn't have to be
repeatedly introduced.

Fixes #8088.

LGTM=iant, r, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/142320043

Right now it is always pkgname.test.exe, but if pkgname is
patch or install or setup or update, Windows thinks that
running it will install new software, so it pops up a dialog
box asking for more permission.
Renaming the binary avoids the Windows security check.

This only applies to the binary that the Go command writes
to its temporary work directory. If the user runs 'go test -c'
or any of the other ways to generate a test binary, it will
continue to use pkgname.test.exe.

Fixes #8711.

LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, r
CC=alex.brainman, bradfitz, golang-codereviews, iant
https://golang.org/cl/146580043

Update #8798

This is a new implementation of pprof,
written in Go instead of in Perl.
It was written primarily by Raul Silvera and
is in use for profiling programs of all languages
inside Google.

The internal structure is a bit package-heavy,
but it matches the copy used inside Google, and
since it is in an internal directory, we can make
changes to it later if we need to.

The only "new" file here is src/cmd/pprof/pprof.go,
which stitches together the Google pprof and the
Go command libraries for object file access.

I am explicitly NOT interested in style or review
comments on the rest of the files
(that is, src/cmd/pprof/internal/...).
Those are intended to stay as close to the Google
copies as possible, like we did with the pprof Perl script.

Still to do:

- Basic tests.
- Real command documentation.
- Hook up disassemblers.

LGTM=r
R=r, bradfitz, alex.brainman, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/153750043

Fixes #8761.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/144530045

Fixes #8309.

LGTM=r
R=golang-codereviews, r
CC=golang-codereviews, iant
https://golang.org/cl/147380043

Fixes #7935.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, ruiu
https://golang.org/cl/147390043

Fixes #8449.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/145600044

For Go 1.3 these external packages were collapsed into
large single-file implementations stored in the cmd/objdump
directory.

For Go 1.4 we want pprof to be able to link against them too,
so move them into cmd/internal, where they can be shared.

The new files are copied from the repo in the file path (rsc.io/...).
Those repos were code reviewed during development
(mainly by crawshaw and minux), because we knew the
main repo would use them.

Update #8798

LGTM=bradfitz
R=crawshaw, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/153750044

Raul wrote the pprof code in CL 153750043.

LGTM=bradfitz, r
R=r, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/146450043

Fixes #7609.

LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/150270043

GC types were not being generated for the garbage collector
work buffer.  The markfor object was being collected as a result.
This broke amd64p32 and maybe plan9 builds.  Why it didn't break
every build I'm not sure...

Fixes #8812

LGTM=0intro, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, dave, khr, 0intro, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/149260043

Newstack runs on g0, g0->throwsplit is never set.

LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews, khr
https://golang.org/cl/147370043

Our traceback code needs to know the PC of several special
functions, including goexit, mcall, etc.  Make sure that
these PCs are initialized before any traceback occurs.

Fixes #8766

LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, rsc, khr, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/145570043

See comment 4 of https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=8483#c4:

"So if a user creates a http.Client, issues a bunch of
requests and then wants to shutdown it and all opened connections;
what is she intended to do? The report suggests that just waiting for
all pending requests and calling CloseIdleConnections won't do, as
there can be new racing connections. Obviously she can't do what
you've done in the test, as it uses the unexported function.  If this
happens periodically, it can lead to serious resource leaks (the
transport is also preserved alive).  Am I missing something?"

This CL tracks the user's intention to close all idle
connections (CloseIdleConnections sets it true; and making a
new request sets it false). If a pending dial finishes and
nobody wants it, before it's retained for a future caller, the
"wantIdle" bool is checked and it's closed if the user has
called CloseIdleConnections without a later call to make a new
request.

Fixes #8483

LGTM=adg
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov, adg
CC=golang-codereviews, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/148970043

Fixes #5551.
Fixes #4449.

Adds tests for both issues.

Note that the two issues occur only when formatting partial Go code
with indent.

The best way to understand the change is as follows: I took the code
of cmd/gofmt and go/format, combined it into one unified code that
does not suffer from either 4449 nor 5551, and then applied that code
to both cmd/gofmt and go/format.

As a result, there is now much more identical code between the two
packages, making future code deduplication easier (it was not possible
to do that now without adding public APIs, which I was advised not to
do at this time).

More specifically, I took the parse() of cmd/gofmt which correctly
preserves comments (issue 5551) and modified it to fix issue where
it would sometimes modify literal values (issue 4449).

I ended up removing the matchSpace() function because it no longer
needed to do some of its work (insert indent), and a part of its work
had to be done in advance (determining the indentation of first code
line), because that calculation is required for cfg.Fprint() to run.

adjustIndent is used to adjust the indent of cfg.Fprint() to compensate
for the body of wrapper func being indented by one level. This allows
to get rid of the bytes.Replace text manipulation of inner content,
which was problematic and sometimes altered raw string literals (issue
4449). This means that sometimes the value of cfg.Indent is negative,
but that works as expected.

So now the algorithm for formatting partial Go code is:

1. Determine and prepend leading space of original source.
2. Determine and prepend indentation of first code line.
3. Format and write partial Go code (with all of its leading &
   trailing space trimmed).
4. Determine and append trailing space of original source.

LGTM=gri
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, gri
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/142360043

Fixes #8690.

This CL moves the save of LR around BL runtime.read_tls_fallback to liblink as it is not needed when MRC is not replaced.

LGTM=rsc, minux
R=rsc, khr, minux
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/147310043

On android, root certificates appear to be stored in the folder
/system/etc/security/cacerts, which has many certs in several
different files. This change adds a new array of directories in
which certs can be found.

To test this, I simply tried making a request with the http
library to an HTTPS URL on an android emulator and manually
verified that it worked.

LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/151800043

Generated by a+c.

R=gobot
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/149260044

We're not comparing with code addresses any more.  Instead,
we use nil algorithm functions to mark uncomparable types.

LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/151040044

Use case is SSE recommended configuration: http://www.w3.org/TR/eventsource/#notes
Removes a TODO.

LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, tommi.virtanen
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/100000044

Fixes #8067

LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/146480043

CL 149110043 changed yacc to no longer keep a leading space
for quoted tokens.  That is OK by itself but unfortunately
yacc was relying on that leading space to notice which tokens
it should not output as const declarations.

Add a few such tokens to expr.y, although it won't make any
immediate difference as we seem to have no tests for yacc.

LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/152720043

Unnecessary; covered by https://golang.org/cl/141690043

Verified by jonathan@titanous.com on golang-dev.

««« original CL description
cmd/ld: close outfile before cleanup

This prevents the temporary directory from being leaked when
the linker is run on a FUSE filesystem.

Fixes #8684.

LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, rsc, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/141840043

»»»

LGTM=jonathan, iant
R=iant, jonathan
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/150250045

The existing spec rules on package initialization were
contradictory: They specified that 1) dependent variables
are initialized in dependency order, and 2) independent
variables are initialized in declaration order. This 2nd
rule cannot be satisfied in general. For instance, for

var (
        c = b + 2
        a = 0
        b = 1
)

because of its dependency on b, c must be initialized after b,
leading to the partial order b, c. Because a is independent of
b but is declared before b, we end up with the order: a, b, c.
But a is also independent of c and is declared after c, so the
order b, c, a should also be valid in contradiction to a, b, c.

The new rules are given in form of an algorithm which outlines
initialization order explicitly.

gccgo and go/types already follow these rules.

Fixes #8485.

LGTM=iant, r, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken, gordon.klaus, adonovan
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/142880043

RFC5280 says that the nextUpdate field is optional.

Fixes #8085.

R=bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/149770044

Fixes #8607

LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/146470043

LGTM=bradfitz
R=bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/138000044

LGTM=bradfitz, minux
R=bradfitz, minux
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/119540043

This prevents the temporary directory from being leaked when
the linker is run on a FUSE filesystem.

Fixes #8684.

LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, rsc, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/141840043

Fixes #8816

At least, I hope it does.

TBR=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/153730043

This fixes the bug in which the linker reports "missing Go
type information" when a -X option refers to a symbol that is
not used.

Fixes #8821.

LGTM=rsc
R=rsc, r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/151000043

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/150190043

The extra-clever code in Sincos is trying to do

        if v&2 == 0 {
                mask = 0xffffffffffffffff
        } else {
                mask = 0
        }

It does this by turning v&2 into a float64 X0 and then using

        MOVSD $0.0, X3
        CMPSD X0, X3, 0

That CMPSD is defined to behave like:

        if X0 == X3 {
                X3 = 0xffffffffffffffff
        } else {
                X3 = 0
        }

which gives the desired mask in X3. The goal in using the
CMPSD was to avoid a conditional branch.

This code fails when called from a PortAudio callback.
In particular, the failure behavior is exactly as if the
CMPSD always chose the 'true' execution.

Notice that the comparison X0 == X3 is comparing as
floating point values the 64-bit pattern v&2 and the actual
floating point value zero. The only possible values for v&2
are 0x0000000000000000 (floating point zero)
and 0x0000000000000002 (floating point 1e-323, a denormal).
If they are both comparing equal to zero, I conclude that
in a PortAudio callback (whatever that means), the processor
is running in "denormals are zero" mode.

I confirmed this by placing the processor into that mode
and running the test case in the bug; it produces the
incorrect output reported in the bug.

In general, if a Go program changes the floating point math
modes to something other than what Go expects, the math
library is not going to work exactly as intended, so we might
be justified in not fixing this at all.

However, it seems reasonable that the client code might
have expected "denormals are zero" mode to only affect
actual processing of denormals. This code has produced
what is in effect a gratuitous denormal by being extra clever.
There is nothing about the computation being requested
that fundamentally requires a denormal.

It is also easy to do this computation in integer math instead:

        mask = ((v&2)>>1)-1

Do that.

For the record, the other math tests that fail if you put the
processor in "denormals are zero" mode are the tests for
Frexp, Ilogb, Ldexp, Logb, Log2, and FloatMinMax, but all
fail processing denormal inputs. Sincos was the only function
for which that mode causes incorrect behavior on non-denormal inputs.

The existing tests check that the new assembly is correct.
There is no test for behavior in "denormals are zero" mode,
because I don't want to add assembly to change that.

Fixes #8623.

LGTM=josharian
R=golang-codereviews, josharian
CC=golang-codereviews, iant, r
https://golang.org/cl/151750043

CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144660043