- 05 Apr, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Cherry Zhang authored
The assembler back end uses F15 as a temporary register in these instructions. Checked the assembler back end and made sure that this is the only case clobbering F15. Fixes #19403. Change-Id: I02b9e00fdd9229db899f501c8e9b306e02912d83 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39598 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Vladimir Stefanovic authored
Removing stray xori that came from big endian copy/paste. Adding atomicand8 check to runtime.check() that would have revealed this error. Might fix #19396. Change-Id: If8d6f25d3e205496163541eb112548aa66df9c2a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39597 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
David Chase authored
The loop-A-encloses-loop-C code did not properly handle the case where really C was already known to be enclosed by B, and A was nearest-outer to B, not C. Fixes #19217. Change-Id: I755dd768e823cb707abdc5302fed39c11cdb34d4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39596 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
David Chase authored
Added a flag to generic and various architectures' atomic operations that are judged to have observable side effects and thus cannot be dead-code-eliminated. Test requires GOMAXPROCS > 1 without preemption in loop. Fixes #19182. Change-Id: Id2230031abd2cca0bbb32fd68fc8a58fb912070f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39595 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
This keeps the host linker from printing ld: warning: option -s is obsolete and being ignored Fixes #19775. Change-Id: I18dd4e4b3f59cbf35dad770fd65e6baea5a7347f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38851 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39606 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Rob Pike authored
This was a subtle bug introduced in the previous release's fix for issue 16156. The definition of empty template was broken, causing the answer to depend on the order of templates in the map. Fixes #16156 (for real). Fixes #19294. Fixes #19204. Change-Id: I1cd915c94534cad3116d83bd158cbc28700510b9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38420 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39594Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Go 1.7 and earlier rejected these images with chunkOrderError. Go 1.8 panicked during decoding. Go 1.9 will handle them successfully. Make Go 1.8.1 match Go 1.7 and earlier, to remove the panic without introducing new functionality in a minor release. Fixes #19553. Change-Id: I3c73a27aa3932300326273b6b563cdf606f3ab64 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39593 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 29 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
The aLongTimeAgo time value in net and net/http is used to cancel in-flight read and writes. It was set to time.Unix(233431200, 0) which seemed like far enough in the past. But Raspberry Pis, lacking a real time clock, had to spoil the fun and boot in 1970 at the Unix epoch time, breaking assumptions in net and net/http. So change aLongTimeAgo to time.Unix(1, 0), which seems like the earliest safe value. I don't trust subsecond values on all operating systems, and I don't trust the Unix zero time. The Raspberry Pis do advance their clock at least. And the reported problem was that Hijack on a ResponseWriter hung forever, waiting for the connection read operation to finish. So now, even if kernel + userspace boots in under a second (unlikely), the Hijack will just have to wait for up to a second. Updates #19747 Fixes #19771 (backport to Go 1.8.x) Change-Id: Id59430de2e7b5b5117d4903a788863e9d344e53a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38785 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit e83fc2e44336423dab94bfe74fad4c4e6a4703b3) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38786Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 27 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Tocar authored
Scheduling values after calls to selectrecv, will cause them to be executed multiple times, due to runtime.selectgo jumping to the next instruction in the selectrecv basic block. Prevent this by scheduling calls to selectrecv as late as possible Fixes #19201 Change-Id: I6415792e2c465dc6d9bd6583ba1e54b107bcf5cc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38587 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
- 25 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Stop reporting errors from cmd.Process.Kill; they don't matter for purposes of this test, and they can occur if the process exits quickly. Fixes #19211. Fixes #19213. Change-Id: I1a0bb9170220ca69199abb8e8811b1dde43e1897 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37309 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 35ffca31) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38607 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
- 23 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Lynn Boger authored
Previously call stubs were generated and inserted in Textp after much of the text, resulting in calls too far in some cases. This puts the call stubs first, which in many cases makes some calls not so far, but also enables trampolines to be generated when necessary. This is a backport for go 1.8 based on CL38131. Fixes #19578 Change-Id: If3ba3d5222a7f7969ed2de1df4854a1b4a80a0f0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38472Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 16 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Steve Francia authored
Updates #17802 Change-Id: I65ea0f4cde973604c04051e7eb25d12e4facecd3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36626Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38312
-
- 09 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Alberto Donizetti authored
The tzdata 2017a update (2017-02-28) changed the abbreviation of the Asia/Baghdad time zone (used in TestParseInLocation) from 'AST' to the numeric '+03'. Update the test so that it skips the checks if we're using a recent tzdata release. Fixes #19457 Change-Id: I45d705a5520743a611bdd194dc8f8d618679980c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37964Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 91563ced) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37991 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 08 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Mike Danese authored
Using GetClientCertificate with the http client is currently completely broken because inside the transport we clone the tls.Config and pass it off to the tls.Client. Since tls.Config.Clone() does not pass forward the GetClientCertificate field, GetClientCertificate is ignored in this context. Fixes #19264 Change-Id: Ie214f9f0039ac7c3a2dab8ffd14d30668bdb4c71 Signed-off-by: Mike Danese <mikedanese@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37541Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 87649d32) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37946 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Bergan <tombergan@google.com>
-
- 03 Mar, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Cherry Zhang authored
Args may be not at 8-byte aligned offset to SP. When the stack frame is large, folding the offset of args may cause large unaligned offsets that does not fit in a machine instruction on ARM64. Therefore disable folding offsets for args. This has small performance impact (see below). A better fix would be letting the assembler backend fix up the offset by loading it into a register if it doesn't fit into an instruction. And the compiler can simply generate large load/stores with offset. Since in most of the cases the offset is aligned or the stack frame is small, it can fit in an instruction and no fixup is needed. But this is too complicated for Go 1.8. name old time/op new time/op delta BinaryTree17-8 8.30s ± 0% 8.31s ± 0% ~ (p=0.579 n=10+10) Fannkuch11-8 6.14s ± 0% 6.18s ± 0% +0.53% (p=0.000 n=9+10) FmtFprintfEmpty-8 117ns ± 0% 117ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) FmtFprintfString-8 196ns ± 0% 197ns ± 0% +0.72% (p=0.000 n=10+10) FmtFprintfInt-8 204ns ± 0% 205ns ± 0% +0.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) FmtFprintfIntInt-8 302ns ± 0% 307ns ± 1% +1.46% (p=0.000 n=10+10) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-8 329ns ± 2% 326ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.083 n=10+10) FmtFprintfFloat-8 540ns ± 0% 542ns ± 0% +0.46% (p=0.000 n=8+7) FmtManyArgs-8 1.20µs ± 1% 1.19µs ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) GobDecode-8 17.3ms ± 1% 17.8ms ± 0% +2.75% (p=0.000 n=10+7) GobEncode-8 15.3ms ± 1% 15.4ms ± 0% +0.57% (p=0.004 n=9+10) Gzip-8 789ms ± 0% 803ms ± 0% +1.78% (p=0.000 n=9+10) Gunzip-8 128ms ± 0% 130ms ± 0% +1.73% (p=0.000 n=10+9) HTTPClientServer-8 202µs ± 6% 201µs ±10% ~ (p=0.739 n=10+10) JSONEncode-8 42.0ms ± 0% 42.1ms ± 0% +0.19% (p=0.028 n=10+9) JSONDecode-8 159ms ± 0% 161ms ± 0% +1.05% (p=0.000 n=9+10) Mandelbrot200-8 10.1ms ± 0% 10.1ms ± 0% -0.07% (p=0.000 n=10+9) GoParse-8 8.46ms ± 1% 8.61ms ± 1% +1.77% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RegexpMatchEasy0_32-8 227ns ± 1% 226ns ± 0% -0.35% (p=0.001 n=10+9) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-8 1.63µs ± 0% 1.63µs ± 0% -0.13% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RegexpMatchEasy1_32-8 250ns ± 0% 249ns ± 0% -0.40% (p=0.001 n=8+9) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-8 2.07µs ± 0% 2.08µs ± 0% +0.05% (p=0.027 n=9+9) RegexpMatchMedium_32-8 350ns ± 0% 350ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.412 n=9+8) RegexpMatchMedium_1K-8 104µs ± 0% 104µs ± 0% +0.31% (p=0.000 n=10+7) RegexpMatchHard_32-8 5.82µs ± 0% 5.82µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.937 n=9+9) RegexpMatchHard_1K-8 176µs ± 0% 176µs ± 0% +0.03% (p=0.000 n=9+8) Revcomp-8 1.36s ± 1% 1.37s ± 1% ~ (p=0.218 n=10+10) Template-8 151ms ± 1% 156ms ± 1% +3.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) TimeParse-8 737ns ± 0% 758ns ± 2% +2.74% (p=0.000 n=10+10) TimeFormat-8 801ns ± 2% 789ns ± 1% -1.51% (p=0.000 n=10+10) [Geo mean] 142µs 143µs +0.50% Fixes #19137. Change-Id: Ib8a21ea98c0ffb2d282a586535b213cc163e1b67 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37251 Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 6464e5dc) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37719Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Cherry Zhang authored
The rules for folding addresses into load/stores checks sym1 is not on stack (because the stack offset is not known at that point). But sym1 could be nil, which invalidates the check. Check merged sym instead. Fixes #19137. Change-Id: I8574da22ced1216bb5850403d8f08ec60a8d1005 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37145 Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 3557d546) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37214
-
Cherry Zhang authored
Fixes #19270. Change-Id: Ie7538ff8465138a8bc02572e84cf5d00de7bbdd1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37718 Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
-
- 02 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Michael Munday authored
A type conversion inserted between MOVD{LT,LE,GT,GE,EQ,NE} and CMPWconst by CL 36256 broke the rewrite rule designed to merge the two. This results in simple for loops (e.g. for i := 0; i < N; i++ {}) emitting two comparisons instead of one, plus a conditional move. This CL explicitly types the input to CMPWconst so that the type conversion can be omitted. It also adds a test to check that conditional moves aren't emitted for loops with 'less than' conditions (i.e. i < N) on s390x. Fixes #19227. Change-Id: I44958eebf6c74c5819b2a9511caf3c47c20fbf45 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37536 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Bill O'Farrell <billotosyr@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Michael Munday authored
Some rules insert MOVDreg ops to ensure that type changes are kept. If there is no type change (or the input is constant) then the MOVDreg can be omitted, allowing further optimization. Reduces the size of the .text section in the asm tool by ~33KB. For #19227. Change-Id: I0f7b40d8dbcda73bca96eb6d2bf13f9ffa88f4b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37535 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
- 27 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Contention profiling is off by default. If you turn it on, it has the unfortunate effect of making the wakeup on a contention mutex go from O(1) to O(n). Change it back to O(1). This is already fixed in essentially the same way on master; master also contains some fixes for the non-profiling code paths. Possible for Go 1.8.1. Change-Id: Iaa644c06e20ca28da4dfa348b7211eedb657e0ba Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37341 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
- 23 Feb, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Alberto Donizetti authored
Fixes #19253 Change-Id: Ia473f51bfe4cf42cf64938993a81d9b1dbc2594d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37433Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37398
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #19244 Change-Id: Ia6332941b229c83d6fd082af49f31003a66b90db Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37388Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37397Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
-
- 16 Feb, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Chris Broadfoot authored
Change-Id: If1e38f02db86449abd4c8a57988d9825b1cf2511 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37132 Run-TryBot: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Chris Broadfoot authored
Change-Id: Ie2144d001c6b4b2293d07b2acf62d7e3cd0b46a7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37130Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37131
-
Russ Cox authored
We have seen one instance of a production job suddenly spinning to 100% CPU and becoming unresponsive. In that one instance, a SIGQUIT was sent after 328 minutes of spinning, and the stacks showed a single goroutine in "IO wait (scan)" state. Looking for things that might get stuck if a goroutine got stuck in scanning a stack, we found that injectglist does: lock(&sched.lock) var n int for n = 0; glist != nil; n++ { gp := glist glist = gp.schedlink.ptr() casgstatus(gp, _Gwaiting, _Grunnable) globrunqput(gp) } unlock(&sched.lock) and that casgstatus spins on gp.atomicstatus until the _Gscan bit goes away. Essentially, this code locks sched.lock and then while holding sched.lock, waits to lock gp.atomicstatus. The code that is doing the scan is: if castogscanstatus(gp, s, s|_Gscan) { if !gp.gcscandone { scanstack(gp, gcw) gp.gcscandone = true } restartg(gp) break loop } More analysis showed that scanstack can, in a rare case, end up calling back into code that acquires sched.lock. For example: runtime.scanstack at proc.go:866 calls runtime.gentraceback at mgcmark.go:842 calls runtime.scanstack$1 at traceback.go:378 calls runtime.scanframeworker at mgcmark.go:819 calls runtime.scanblock at mgcmark.go:904 calls runtime.greyobject at mgcmark.go:1221 calls (*runtime.gcWork).put at mgcmark.go:1412 calls (*runtime.gcControllerState).enlistWorker at mgcwork.go:127 calls runtime.wakep at mgc.go:632 calls runtime.startm at proc.go:1779 acquires runtime.sched.lock at proc.go:1675 This path was found with an automated deadlock-detecting tool. There are many such paths but they all go through enlistWorker -> wakep. The evidence strongly suggests that one of these paths is what caused the deadlock we observed. We're running those jobs with GOTRACEBACK=crash now to try to get more information if it happens again. Further refinement and analysis shows that if we drop the wakep call from enlistWorker, the remaining few deadlock cycles found by the tool are all false positives caused by not understanding the effect of calls to func variables. The enlistWorker -> wakep call was intended only as a performance optimization, it rarely executes, and if it does execute at just the wrong time it can (and plausibly did) cause the deadlock we saw. Comment it out, to avoid the potential deadlock. Fixes #19112. Unfixes #14179. Change-Id: I6f7e10b890b991c11e79fab7aeefaf70b5d5a07b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37093 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37022 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 15 Feb, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Sarah Adams authored
This change removes the punitive language and anonymous reporting mechanism from the Code of Conduct document. Read on for the rationale. More than a year has passed since the Go Code of Conduct was introduced. In that time, there have been a small number (<30) of reports to the Working Group. Some reports we handled well, with positive outcomes for all involved. A few reports we handled badly, resulting in hurt feelings and a bad experience for all involved. On reflection, the reports that had positive outcomes were ones where the Working Group took the role of advisor/facilitator, listening to complaints and providing suggestions and advice to the parties involved. The reports that had negative outcomes were ones where the subject of the report felt threatened by the Working Group and Code of Conduct. After some discussion among the Working Group, we saw that we are most effective as facilitators, rather than disciplinarians. The various Go spaces already have moderators; this change to the CoC acknowledges their authority and places the group in a purely advisory role. If an incident is reported to the group we may provide information to or make a suggestion the moderators, but the Working Group need not (and should not) have any authority to take disciplinary action. In short, we want it to be clear that the Working Group are here to help resolve conflict, period. The second change made here is the removal of the anonymous reporting mechanism. To date, the quality of anonymous reports has been low, and with no way to reach out to the reporter for more information there is often very little we can do in response. Removing this one-way reporting mechanism strengthens the message that the Working Group are here to facilitate a constructive dialogue. Change-Id: Iee52aff5446accd0dae0c937bb3aa89709ad5fb4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37014Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37040Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
[release-branch.go1.8] encoding/xml: fix incorrect indirect code in chardata, comment, innerxml fields The new tests in this CL have been checked against Go 1.7 as well and all pass in Go 1.7, with the one exception noted in a comment (an intentional change to omitempty already present before this CL). CL 15684 made the intentional change to omitempty. This CL fixes bugs introduced along the way. Most of these are corner cases that are arguably not that important, but they've always worked all the way back to Go 1, and someone cared enough to file #19063. The most significant problem found while adding tests is that in the case of a nil *string field with `xml:",chardata"`, the existing code silently stops processing not just that field but the entire remainder of the struct. Even if #19063 were not worth fixing, this chardata bug would be. Fixes #19063. Change-Id: I318cf8f9945e1a4615982d9904e109fde577ebf9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36954 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 72aa757d) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37016 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
- 13 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Daniel Theophanes authored
When testing context cancelation behavior do not rely on context timeouts. Use explicit checks in all such tests. In closeDB convert the simple check for zero open conns with a wait loop for zero open conns. Fixes #19024 Fixes #19041 Change-Id: Iecfcc4467e91249fceb21ffd1f7c62c58140d8e9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36902 Run-TryBot: Daniel Theophanes <kardianos@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36917 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Theophanes <kardianos@gmail.com>
-
- 10 Feb, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
Otherwise, calling PtrTo on the result will fail. Fixes #19003 Change-Id: I8d7d1981a5d0417d5aee52740469d71e90734963 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36731 Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36718 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Daniel Theophanes authored
Previously if a connection was requested but timed out during the request and when acquiring the db.Lock the connection request is fulfilled and the request is unable to be returned to the connection pool, then then driver connection would not be closed. No tests were added or modified because I was unable to determine how to trigger this situation without something invasive. Change-Id: I9d4dc680e3fdcf63d79d212174a5b8b313f363f1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36641Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36714 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Daniel Theophanes authored
Previously if a context was canceled while it was waiting for a connection request, that connection request would leak. To prevent this remove the pending connection request if the context is canceled and ensure no connection has been sent on the channel. This requires a change to how the connection requests are represented in the DB. Fixes #18995 Change-Id: I9a274b48b8f4f7ca46cdee166faa38f56d030852 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36563Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36613Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 09 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Daniel Theophanes authored
Previously it was intended that Rows.Scan would return an error and Rows.Err would return nil. This was problematic because drivers could not differentiate between a normal Rows.Close or a context cancel close. The alternative is to require drivers to return a Scan to return an error if the driver is closed while there are still rows to be read. This is currently not how several drivers currently work and may be difficult to detect when there are additional rows. At the same time guard the the Rows.lasterr and prevent a close while a Rows operation is active. For the drivers that do not have Context methods, do not check for context cancelation after the operation, but before for any operation that may modify the database state. Fixes #18961 Change-Id: I49a25318ecd9f97a35d5b50540ecd850c01cfa5e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36485Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36614Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 08 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Russ Cox authored
We added CentOS 7's /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/tls-ca-bundle.pem to the list in response to #17549 - not being able to find any certs otherwise. Now we have #18813, where CentOS 6 apparently has both that file and /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt, and the latter is complete while the former is not. Moving the new CentOS 7 file to the bottom of the list should fix both problems: the CentOS 7 system that didn't have any of the other files in the list will still find the new one, and existing systems will still keep using what they were using instead of preferring the new path that may or may not be complete on some systems. Fixes #18813. Change-Id: I5275ab67424b95e7210e14938d3e986c8caee0ba Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36429 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36530 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 07 Feb, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #18863. Change-Id: I0723563cd23728b0d43ebcc25979bf8d21e2a72c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36427 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36536Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Cherry Zhang authored
The compiler did not emit write barrier for assigning global with struct literal, like global = T{} where T contains pointer. The relevant code path is: walkexpr OAS var_ OSTRUCTLIT oaslit anylit OSTRUCTLIT walkexpr OAS var_ nil return without adding write barrier return true break (without adding write barrier) This CL makes oaslit not apply to globals. See also CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/36355/ for an alternative fix. The downside of this is that it generates static data for zeroing struct now. Also this only covers global. If there is any lurking bug with implicit zeroing other than globals, this doesn't fix. Fixes #18956. Change-Id: Ibcd27e4fae3aa38390ffa94a32a9dd7a802e4b37 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36410Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 160914e3) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36531
-
Robert Griesemer authored
[release-branch.go1.8] cmd/compile/internal/syntax: avoid follow-up error for incorrect if statement This is a follow-up on https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470 and leads to a more stable fix. The above CL relied on filtering of multiple errors on the same line to avoid more than one error for an `if` statement of the form `if a := 10 {}`. This CL avoids the secondary error ("missing condition in if statement") in the first place. For #18915. Change-Id: I8517f485cc2305965276c17d8f8797d61ef9e999 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36479 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36424 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
For code such as if a := 10 { ... the 1.7 compiler reported a := 10 used as value while the 1.8 compiler reported invalid condition, tag, or type switch guard Changed the error message to match the 1.7 compiler. Fixes #18915. Change-Id: I01308862e461922e717f9f8295a9db53d5a914eb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36422 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
David Crawshaw authored
Now `go test -buildmode=pie std -short` passes on linux/amd64. Updates #18968 Change-Id: Ide21877713e00edc64c1700c950016d6bff8de0e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36417Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36421 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
Dave and Jason have moved on to other things. Change-Id: I702d11bedfab1f47a33679a48c2309f49021229e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36450Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36474Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
- 06 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Original code fixed in https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/36359/. Fixes #18820. Change-Id: I060e6c9d0e312b4fd5d0674aff131055bf5cf61d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36412 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36414Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-