- 02 Feb, 2015 7 commits
-
-
Austin Clements authored
Commit 656be317 replaced onM with systemstack, but missed updating a few comments that still referred to onM. Update these. Change-Id: I0efb017e9a66ea0adebb6e1da6e518ee11263f69 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3664Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
9g generates needlessly complex code for small copies. There are a few other things that need to be improved about the copy code, so for now just note the problem. Change-Id: I0f1de4b2f9197a2635e27cc4b91ecf7a6c11f457 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3665Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Change-Id: I278ce47b38ec5732d981aec06b71f9ee5747c3bb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3730Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Dmitri Shuralyov authored
In stripCommonPrefix, the prefix was correctly calculated in all cases, except one. That unhandled case is when there are more than 2 lines, but all lines are blank (other than the first and last lines, which contain /* and */ respectively). This change detects that case and correctly sets the prefix calculated from the last line. This is consistent with the (correct) behavior that happens when there's at least one non-blank line. That fixes issue #9751 that occurs for problematic input, where cmd/gofmt and go/source would insert extra indentation on every format operation. It also allows go/printer itself to print such parsed files in an expected way. Fixes #9751. Change-Id: Id3dfb945beb59ffad3705085a3c285fca30a5f87 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3684Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
David du Colombier authored
Since CL 3676, the TestMkdirAllAtSlash test depends on syscall.EROFS, which isn't defined on Plan 9. This change works around this issue by defining a system dependent isReadonlyError function. Change-Id: If972fd2fe4828ee3bcb8537ea7f4ba29f7a87619 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3696Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Shenghou Ma authored
Fixes #9738. Change-Id: Iab75de2d78335d4e31c3dce6a0e1826d8cddf5f3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3690Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
-
David Crawshaw authored
Change-Id: Iea4221186325783db2029b07af1409015ddeda99 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3695Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
-
- 31 Jan, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Dave Cheney authored
This is a followup to CL 3676. Rather than silently returning from the test, a pass, use the Skip facility to mark the test as skipped. Change-Id: I90d237e770150bf8d69f14fb09874e70894a7f86 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3682Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 30 Jan, 2015 25 commits
-
-
Rahul Chaudhry authored
On some systems (e.g. ChromeOS), / is mounted read-only. This results in error code syscall.EROFS, which I guess is just as valid as syscall.EACCES for this test. Change-Id: I9188d5437a1b5ac1daa9c68b95b8dcb447666ca3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3676Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
No other functional changes. Change-Id: I7e0bb7452c6a265535297ec7ce6a629f1aff695c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3674Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
No other functional changes. Change-Id: I8be1fc488caa4f3d4c00afcb8c00475bfcd10709 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3673Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
No other functional changes. Change-Id: If0d9e6208d53478e70d991b6926ea196b2cccf2e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3672Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
No functional changes. Change-Id: Ibbb705b167603d30467f3ebb83a3bb39845306a5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3671Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Change-Id: I1eaebf956a69e0958201cc5e0a9beefa062c71e1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3454Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
Change-Id: I257211f10b334eb4828be96cd434d588bfb1a378 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3605Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
Fixes #9629 Change-Id: I66091003b97742ca6d857fe51d609833ab727216 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3023Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #9656 Change-Id: I1158636683492ef12eeafb12e257d205026adc3f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3175Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
These are no longer used by anything. Change-Id: I50c971418b07cafc983242833a196ba2028a2723 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3603Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Dave Cheney authored
Another attempt to fix the arm build by moving the include of signal.h to cmd/lex.c, unless we are building on plan9. Obviously if we had a plan9/arm builder this would probably not work, but this is only a temporary measure until the c2go transition is complete. Change-Id: I7f8ae27349b2e7a09c55db03e02a01939159a268 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3566Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Dmitry Vyukov authored
The following line in sysFree: n += (n + memRound) &^ memRound doubles value of n (n += n). Which is wrong and can lead to memory corruption. Fixes #9712 Change-Id: I3c141b71da11e38837c09408cf4f1d22e8f7f36e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3602Reviewed-by: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
-
Dmitry Vyukov authored
Change-Id: I8c7fcc7705070bc9979e39d08a4c9b2870087a08 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3500Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I32cad7358f5bfd8e107179653bdc55a69fbe772a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3579Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
REG_R0 etc are defined in <ucontext.h> on ARM systems. Possible use of uninitialized n in 8g/reg.c. Change-Id: I6e8ce83a6515ca2b779ed8a344a25432db629cc2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3578Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
There are no D_ names anymore. Change-Id: Id3f1ce5efafb93818e5fd16c47ff48bbf61b5339 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3520Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I55afed0eabf3c38e72ff105294782ac36446b66b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3519Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I19ed283962aa0221cf806307bde9ea0773a1bfd4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3518Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I5535582660da3504663c6cba2637da132c65a400 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3517Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I06762d4fb3bb2616087339b6ae1eb5267a39c46a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3516Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: Ia6f8badca56565b9df80c8dbe28c47f6cf7e653f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3515Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: Idda476b71ae23f7b73fe63f062cf3531c1268eb3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3514Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro> Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
-
Russ Cox authored
headstr(Hlinux) was reporting "android", making for some confusing error messages. Change-Id: I437095bee7cb2143aa37c91cf786f3a3581ae7b9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3513Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
In addition to duplicating the logic, the old code was clearing the line number, which led to missing source line information in the -S output. Also fix nopout, which was incomplete. Change-Id: Ic2b596a2f9ec2fe85642ebe125cca8ef38c83085 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3512Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
-
Russ Cox authored
- certain code paths were appending to the string without first clearing it. - some prints were using spaces instead of tabs Change-Id: I7a3d38289c8206682baf8942abf5a9950a56b449 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3511Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
-
- 29 Jan, 2015 7 commits
-
-
Robert Griesemer authored
cmd/go doesn't complain (this is an open issue), but go/types does Change-Id: I2caec1f7aec991a9500d2c3504c29e4ab718c138 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3541Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Rick Hudson authored
Set gcscanvalid=false after you have cased to _Grunning. If you do it before the cas and the atomicstatus races to a scan state, the scan will set gcscanvalid=true and we will be _Grunning with gcscanvalid==true which is not a good thing. Change-Id: Ie53ea744a5600392b47da91159d985fe6fe75961 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3510Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Yet another leftover from C: parfor took a func value for the callback, casted it to an unsafe.Pointer for storage, and then casted it back to a func value to call it. This is unnecessary, so just store the body as a func value. Beyond general cleanup, this also eliminates the last use of unsafe in parfor. Change-Id: Ia904af7c6c443ba75e2699835aee8e9a39b26dd8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3396Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Prior to the conversion of the runtime to Go, this void* was necessary to get closure information in to C callbacks. There are no more C callbacks and parfor is perfectly capable of invoking a Go closure now, so eliminate ctx and all of its unsafe-ness. (Plus, the runtime currently doesn't use ctx for anything.) Change-Id: I39fc53b7dd3d7f660710abc76b0d831bfc6296d8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3395Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
parfor originally used a tail array for its thread array. This got replaced with a slice allocation in the conversion to Go, but many of its gnarlier effects remained. Instead of keeping track of the pointer to the first element of the slice and using unsafe pointer math to get at the ith element, just keep the slice around and use regular slice indexing. There is no longer any need for padding to 64-bit align the tail array (there hasn't been since the Go conversion), so remove this unnecessary padding from the parfor struct. Finally, since the slice tracks its own length, replace the nthrmax field with len(thr). Change-Id: I0020a1815849bca53e3613a8fa46ae4fbae67576 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3394Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This cleanup was slated for after the conversion of the runtime to Go. Also improve type and function documentation. Change-Id: I55a16b09e00cf701f246deb69e7ce7e3e04b26e7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3393Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, if we do an atomic{load,store}64 of an unaligned address on 386, we'll simply get a non-atomic load/store. This has been the source of myriad bugs, so add alignment checks to these two operations. These checks parallel the equivalent checks in sync/atomic. The alignment check is not necessary in cas64 because it uses a locked instruction. The CPU will either execute this atomically or raise an alignment fault (#AC)---depending on the alignment check flag---either of which is fine. This also fixes the two places in the runtime that trip the new checks. One is in the runtime self-test and shouldn't have caused real problems. The other is in tickspersecond and could, in principle, have caused a misread of the ticks per second during initialization. Change-Id: If1796667012a6154f64f5e71d043c7f5fb3dd050 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3521Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-