REP MOVSQ and REP STOSQ have a really high startup overhead.
Use a Duff's device to do the repetition instead.

benchmark                 old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkClearFat32       7.20          1.60          -77.78%
BenchmarkCopyFat32        6.88          2.38          -65.41%
BenchmarkClearFat64       7.15          3.20          -55.24%
BenchmarkCopyFat64        6.88          3.44          -50.00%
BenchmarkClearFat128      9.53          5.34          -43.97%
BenchmarkCopyFat128       9.27          5.56          -40.02%
BenchmarkClearFat256      13.8          9.53          -30.94%
BenchmarkCopyFat256       13.5          10.3          -23.70%
BenchmarkClearFat512      22.3          18.0          -19.28%
BenchmarkCopyFat512       22.0          19.7          -10.45%
BenchmarkCopyFat1024      36.5          38.4          +5.21%
BenchmarkClearFat1024     35.1          35.0          -0.28%

TODO: use for stack frame zeroing
TODO: REP prefixes are still used for "reverse" copying when src/dst
regions overlap.  Might be worth fixing.

LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/81370046