Currently sudog.elem is never accessed concurrently, so in several
cases we drop the channel lock just before reading/writing the
sent/received value from/to sudog.elem. However, concurrent stack
shrinking is going to have to adjust sudog.elem to point to the new
stack, which means it needs a way to synchronize with accesses to
sudog.elem. Hence, add sudog.elem to the fields protected by
hchan.lock and scoot the unlocks down past the uses of sudog.elem.

While we're here, better document the channel synchronization rules.

For #12967.

Change-Id: I3ad0ca71f0a74b0716c261aef21b2f7f13f74917
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20040Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>