Commit 9bf34786 authored by Luuk van Dijk's avatar Luuk van Dijk

gc: better loopdepth analysis for labels

This avoids degraded performance caused by extra labels
emitted by inlining (breaking strconv ftoa alloc count unittest) and is better in any case.

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5483071
parent cebf55dc
......@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
static void escfunc(Node *func);
static void esclist(NodeList *l);
static void esc(Node *n);
static void escloopdepthlist(NodeList *l);
static void escloopdepth(Node *n);
static void escassign(Node *dst, Node *src);
static void esccall(Node*);
static void escflows(Node *dst, Node *src);
......@@ -138,11 +140,64 @@ escfunc(Node *func)
escassign(curfn, n);
}
escloopdepthlist(curfn->nbody);
esclist(curfn->nbody);
curfn = savefn;
loopdepth = saveld;
}
// Mark labels that have no backjumps to them as not increasing loopdepth.
// Walk hasn't generated (goto|label)->left->sym->label yet, so we'll cheat
// and set it to one of the following two. Then in esc we'll clear it again.
static Label looping;
static Label nonlooping;
static void
escloopdepthlist(NodeList *l)
{
for(; l; l=l->next)
escloopdepth(l->n);
}
static void
escloopdepth(Node *n)
{
if(n == N)
return;
escloopdepthlist(n->ninit);
switch(n->op) {
case OLABEL:
if(!n->left || !n->left->sym)
fatal("esc:label without label: %+N", n);
// Walk will complain about this label being already defined, but that's not until
// after escape analysis. in the future, maybe pull label & goto analysis out of walk and put before esc
// if(n->left->sym->label != nil)
// fatal("escape analysis messed up analyzing label: %+N", n);
n->left->sym->label = &nonlooping;
break;
case OGOTO:
if(!n->left || !n->left->sym)
fatal("esc:goto without label: %+N", n);
// If we come past one that's uninitialized, this must be a (harmless) forward jump
// but if it's set to nonlooping the label must have preceded this goto.
if(n->left->sym->label == &nonlooping)
n->left->sym->label = &looping;
break;
}
escloopdepth(n->left);
escloopdepth(n->right);
escloopdepthlist(n->list);
escloopdepth(n->ntest);
escloopdepth(n->nincr);
escloopdepthlist(n->nbody);
escloopdepthlist(n->nelse);
escloopdepthlist(n->rlist);
}
static void
esclist(NodeList *l)
{
......@@ -188,9 +243,20 @@ esc(Node *n)
n->left->escloopdepth = loopdepth;
break;
case OLABEL: // TODO: new loop/scope only if there are backjumps to it.
loopdepth++;
break;
case OLABEL:
if(n->left->sym->label == &nonlooping) {
if(debug['m'] > 1)
print("%L:%N non-looping label\n", lineno, n);
} else if(n->left->sym->label == &looping) {
if(debug['m'] > 1)
print("%L: %N looping label\n", lineno, n);
loopdepth++;
}
// See case OLABEL in escloopdepth above
// else if(n->left->sym->label == nil)
// fatal("escape anaylysis missed or messed up a label: %+N", n);
n->left->sym->label = nil;
case ORANGE:
// Everything but fixed array is a dereference.
......
......@@ -913,6 +913,11 @@ stmtfmt(Fmt *f, Node *n)
else
fmtprint(f, "%#O", n->op);
break;
case OLABEL:
fmtprint(f, "%N: ", n->left);
break;
}
if(extrablock)
......@@ -1016,6 +1021,7 @@ static int opprec[] = {
[OFALL] = -1,
[OFOR] = -1,
[OIF] = -1,
[OLABEL] = -1,
[OPROC] = -1,
[ORANGE] = -1,
[ORETURN] = -1,
......
......@@ -1011,3 +1011,24 @@ func foo121b() {
go fmt.Printf("%d", i) // ERROR "[.][.][.] argument escapes to heap"
}
}
// a harmless forward jump
func foo122() {
var i *int
goto L1
L1:
i = new(int) // ERROR "does not escape"
_ = i
}
// a backward jump, increases loopdepth
func foo123() {
var i *int
L1:
i = new(int) // ERROR "escapes"
goto L1
_ = i
}
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment