- 15 Feb, 2017 9 commits
-
-
Heschi Kreinick authored
Change-Id: If268b42b32e6bcd6e7913bffa6e493dc78af40aa Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36539 TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Lynn Boger authored
This adds more information to the pkg stale reason for debugging purposes. Change-Id: I7b626db4520baa1127195ae859f4da9b49304636 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36944Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
This changes the os package to use the runtime poller for file I/O where possible. When a system call blocks on a pollable descriptor, the goroutine will be blocked on the poller but the thread will be released to run other goroutines. When using a non-pollable descriptor, the os package will continue to use thread-blocking system calls as before. For example, on GNU/Linux, the runtime poller uses epoll. epoll does not support ordinary disk files, so they will continue to use blocking I/O as before. The poller will be used for pipes. Since this means that the poller is used for many more programs, this modifies the runtime to only block waiting for the poller if there is some goroutine that is waiting on the poller. Otherwise, there is no point, as the poller will never make any goroutine ready. This preserves the runtime's current simple deadlock detection. This seems to crash FreeBSD systems, so it is disabled on FreeBSD. This is issue 19093. Using the poller on Windows requires opening the file with FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED. We should only do that if we can remove that flag if the program calls the Fd method. This is issue 19098. Update #6817. Update #7903. Update #15021. Update #18507. Update #19093. Update #19098. Change-Id: Ia5197dcefa7c6fbcca97d19a6f8621b2abcbb1fe Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36800 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Dave Cheney authored
Change-Id: Ic2b20c8238ff0ca5513d32e54ef2945fa4d0c3d2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37033 Run-TryBot: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Marcel van Lohuizen authored
Fixes golang/go#18815. Change-Id: Ic9d5cb640a555c58baedd597ed4ca5dd9f275c97 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36990 Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
- ignore them, if they don't. - added tests Fixes #18393. Change-Id: I13f87b81ac6b9138ab5031bb3dd6bebc4c548156 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37020 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Alex Brainman authored
We did not create it. We should not delete it. Change-Id: If98454ab233ce25367e11a7c68d31b49074537dd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37030Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Fixes #18231. Change-Id: If1615da4db0e6f0516369a1dc37340d80c78f237 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37018Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Until now, the parser set the position for each Node to the position of the first token belonging to that node. For compatibility with the now defunct gc parser, in many places that position information was modified when the gcCompat flag was set (which it was, by default). Furthermore, in some places, position information was not set at all. This change removes the gcCompat flag and all associated code, and sets position information for all nodes in a more principled way, as proposed by mdempsky (see #16943 for details). Specifically, the position of a node may not be at the very beginning of the respective production. For instance for an Operation `a + b`, the position associated with the node is the position of the `+`. Thus, for `a + b + c` we now get different positions for the two additions. This change does not pass toolstash -cmp because position information recorded in export data and pcline tables is different. There are no other functional changes. Added test suite testing the position of all nodes. Fixes #16943. Change-Id: I3fc02bf096bc3b3d7d2fa655dfd4714a1a0eb90c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37017 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
- 14 Feb, 2017 21 commits
-
-
Daniel Martí authored
Change-Id: I280c53be455f2fe0474ad577c0f7b7908a4eccb2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36993Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
The new tests in this CL have been checked against Go 1.7 as well and all pass in Go 1.7, with the one exception noted in a comment (an intentional change to omitempty already present before this CL). CL 15684 made the intentional change to omitempty. This CL fixes bugs introduced along the way. Most of these are corner cases that are arguably not that important, but they've always worked all the way back to Go 1, and someone cared enough to file #19063. The most significant problem found while adding tests is that in the case of a nil *string field with `xml:",chardata"`, the existing code silently stops processing not just that field but the entire remainder of the struct. Even if #19063 were not worth fixing, this chardata bug would be. Fixes #19063. Change-Id: I318cf8f9945e1a4615982d9904e109fde577ebf9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36954 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
These are possible use-cases for sync.Map. Updates golang/go#18177 Change-Id: I5e2a3d1249967c37d3f89a41122bf4a90522db11 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36964Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
... and same for stores. This does for binary.BigEndian.Uint16() what was already done for Uint32 and Uint64 with BSWAP in 10f75748 (CL 32222). Here is how generated code changes e.g. for the following function (omitting saying the same prologue/epilogue): func get16(b [2]byte) uint16 { return binary.BigEndian.Uint16(b[:]) } "".get16 t=1 size=21 args=0x10 locals=0x0 // before 0x0000 00000 (x.go:15) MOVBLZX "".b+9(FP), AX 0x0005 00005 (x.go:15) MOVBLZX "".b+8(FP), CX 0x000a 00010 (x.go:15) SHLL $8, CX 0x000d 00013 (x.go:15) ORL CX, AX // after 0x0000 00000 (x.go:15) MOVWLZX "".b+8(FP), AX 0x0005 00005 (x.go:15) ROLW $8, AX encoding/binary is speedup overall a bit: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadSlice1000Int32s-4 4.83µs ± 0% 4.83µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.206 n=4+5) ReadStruct-4 1.29µs ± 2% 1.28µs ± 1% -1.27% (p=0.032 n=4+5) ReadInts-4 384ns ± 1% 385ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.968 n=4+5) WriteInts-4 534ns ± 3% 526ns ± 0% -1.54% (p=0.048 n=4+5) WriteSlice1000Int32s-4 5.02µs ± 0% 5.11µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.175 n=4+5) PutUint16-4 0.59ns ± 0% 0.49ns ± 2% -16.95% (p=0.016 n=4+5) PutUint32-4 0.52ns ± 0% 0.52ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) PutUint64-4 0.53ns ± 0% 0.53ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) PutUvarint32-4 19.9ns ± 0% 19.9ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.556 n=4+5) PutUvarint64-4 54.5ns ± 1% 54.2ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.333 n=4+5) name old speed new speed delta ReadSlice1000Int32s-4 829MB/s ± 0% 828MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.190 n=4+5) ReadStruct-4 58.0MB/s ± 2% 58.7MB/s ± 1% +1.30% (p=0.032 n=4+5) ReadInts-4 78.0MB/s ± 1% 77.8MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.968 n=4+5) WriteInts-4 56.1MB/s ± 3% 57.0MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.063 n=4+5) WriteSlice1000Int32s-4 797MB/s ± 0% 783MB/s ± 3% ~ (p=0.190 n=4+5) PutUint16-4 3.37GB/s ± 0% 4.07GB/s ± 2% +20.83% (p=0.016 n=4+5) PutUint32-4 7.73GB/s ± 0% 7.72GB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.556 n=4+5) PutUint64-4 15.1GB/s ± 0% 15.1GB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.905 n=4+5) PutUvarint32-4 201MB/s ± 0% 201MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.905 n=4+5) PutUvarint64-4 147MB/s ± 1% 147MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.286 n=4+5) ( "a bit" only because most of the time is spent in reflection-like things there, not actual bytes decoding. Even for direct PutUint16 benchmark the looping adds overhead and lowers visible benefit. For code-generated encoders / decoders actual effect is more than 20% ) Adding Uint32 and Uint64 raw benchmarks too for completeness. NOTE I had to adjust load-combining rule for bswap case to match first 2 bytes loads as result of "2-bytes load+shift" -> "loadw + rorw 8" rewrite. Reason is: for loads+shift, even e.g. into uint16 var var b []byte var v uin16 v = uint16(b[1]) | uint16(b[0])<<8 the compiler eventually generates L(ong) shift - SHLLconst [8], probably because it is more straightforward / other reasons to work on the whole register. This way 2 bytes rewriting rule is using SHLLconst (not SHLWconst) in its pattern, and then it always gets matched first, even if 2-byte rule comes syntactically after 4-byte rule in AMD64.rules because 4-bytes rule seemingly needs more applyRewrite() cycles to trigger. If 2-bytes rule gets matched for inner half of var b []byte var v uin32 v = uint32(b[3]) | uint32(b[2])<<8 | uint32(b[1])<<16 | uint32(b[0])<<24 and we keep 4-byte load rule unchanged, the result will be MOVW + RORW $8 and then series of byte loads and shifts - not one MOVL + BSWAPL. There is no such problem for stores: there compiler, since it probably knows store destination is 2 bytes wide, uses SHRWconst 8 (not SHRLconst 8) and thus 2-byte store rule is not a subset of rule for 4-byte stores. Fixes #17151 (int16 was last missing piece there) Change-Id: Idc03ba965bfce2b94fef456b02ff6742194748f6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34636Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com> Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Add a benchmark for setting a String value, which we may want to treat differently from Int or Float due to the need to support Add methods for the latter. Update tests to use only the exported API instead of making (fragile) assumptions about unexported fields. The existing Map benchmarks construct a new Map for each iteration, which focuses the benchmark results on the initial allocation costs for the Map and its entries. This change adds variants of the benchmarks which use a long-lived map in order to measure steady-state performance for Map updates on existing keys. Updates #18177 Change-Id: I62c920991d17d5898c592446af382cd5c04c528a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36959Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Michael Munday authored
The tests failed to compile when using the math_big_pure_go tag on s390x. Change-Id: I2a09f53ff6562ab9bc9b886cffc0f6205bbfcfbb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36956 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Cherry Zhang authored
CL 35261 introduces special handling of zero-valued STRUCTLIT for efficient struct zeroing. But it didn't cover all use cases, for example, CONVNOP STRUCTLIT is not handled. On the other hand, CL 34566 handles zeroing earlier, so we don't need the change in CL 35261 for efficient zeroing. Other uses of zero-valued struct literals are very rare. So undo the change in walk.go in CL 35261. Add a test for efficient zeroing. Fixes #19084. Change-Id: I0807f7423fb44d47bf325b3c1ce9611a14953853 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36955Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Commit 10f75748 (CL 32222) added rewrite rules to combine byte loads/stores + shifts into larger loads/stores + bswap. For loads both MOVBload and MOVBloadidx1 were handled but for store only MOVBstore was there without MOVBstoreidx added to rewrite pattern. Fix it. Here is how generated code changes for the following 2 functions (ommitting staying the same prologue/epilogue): func put32(b []byte, i int, v uint32) { binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(b[i:], v) } func put64(b []byte, i int, v uint64) { binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b[i:], v) } "".put32 t=1 size=100 args=0x28 locals=0x0 // before 0x0032 00050 (x.go:5) MOVL CX, DX 0x0034 00052 (x.go:5) SHRL $24, CX 0x0037 00055 (x.go:5) MOVQ "".b+8(FP), BX 0x003c 00060 (x.go:5) MOVB CL, (BX)(AX*1) 0x003f 00063 (x.go:5) MOVL DX, CX 0x0041 00065 (x.go:5) SHRL $16, DX 0x0044 00068 (x.go:5) MOVB DL, 1(BX)(AX*1) 0x0048 00072 (x.go:5) MOVL CX, DX 0x004a 00074 (x.go:5) SHRL $8, CX 0x004d 00077 (x.go:5) MOVB CL, 2(BX)(AX*1) 0x0051 00081 (x.go:5) MOVB DL, 3(BX)(AX*1) // after 0x0032 00050 (x.go:5) BSWAPL CX 0x0034 00052 (x.go:5) MOVQ "".b+8(FP), DX 0x0039 00057 (x.go:5) MOVL CX, (DX)(AX*1) "".put64 t=1 size=155 args=0x28 locals=0x0 // before 0x0037 00055 (x.go:9) MOVQ CX, DX 0x003a 00058 (x.go:9) SHRQ $56, CX 0x003e 00062 (x.go:9) MOVQ "".b+8(FP), BX 0x0043 00067 (x.go:9) MOVB CL, (BX)(AX*1) 0x0046 00070 (x.go:9) MOVQ DX, CX 0x0049 00073 (x.go:9) SHRQ $48, DX 0x004d 00077 (x.go:9) MOVB DL, 1(BX)(AX*1) 0x0051 00081 (x.go:9) MOVQ CX, DX 0x0054 00084 (x.go:9) SHRQ $40, CX 0x0058 00088 (x.go:9) MOVB CL, 2(BX)(AX*1) 0x005c 00092 (x.go:9) MOVQ DX, CX 0x005f 00095 (x.go:9) SHRQ $32, DX 0x0063 00099 (x.go:9) MOVB DL, 3(BX)(AX*1) 0x0067 00103 (x.go:9) MOVQ CX, DX 0x006a 00106 (x.go:9) SHRQ $24, CX 0x006e 00110 (x.go:9) MOVB CL, 4(BX)(AX*1) 0x0072 00114 (x.go:9) MOVQ DX, CX 0x0075 00117 (x.go:9) SHRQ $16, DX 0x0079 00121 (x.go:9) MOVB DL, 5(BX)(AX*1) 0x007d 00125 (x.go:9) MOVQ CX, DX 0x0080 00128 (x.go:9) SHRQ $8, CX 0x0084 00132 (x.go:9) MOVB CL, 6(BX)(AX*1) 0x0088 00136 (x.go:9) MOVB DL, 7(BX)(AX*1) // after 0x0033 00051 (x.go:9) BSWAPQ CX 0x0036 00054 (x.go:9) MOVQ "".b+8(FP), DX 0x003b 00059 (x.go:9) MOVQ CX, (DX)(AX*1) Updates #17151 Change-Id: I3f4a7f28f210e62e153e60da5abd1d39508cc6c4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34635 Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
-
Kale Blankenship authored
Fixes #19085 Change-Id: Ib11b9a22ea8092aca9e1c9c36b1fb015dd555c4b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36943Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Since we're no longer stealing space for the stack barrier array from the stack allocation, the stack allocation is simply g.stack.hi-g.stack.lo. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Id9b450ae12c3df9ec59cfc4365481a0a16b7c601 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36621 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Now that we don't rescan stacks, stack barriers are unnecessary. This removes all of the code and structures supporting them as well as tests that were specifically for stack barriers. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Ia29221730e0f2bbe7beab4fa757f31a032d9690c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36620 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
With the hybrid barrier, rescanning stacks is no longer necessary so the rescan list is no longer necessary. Remove it. This leaves the gcrescanstacks GODEBUG variable, since it's useful for debugging, but changes it to simply walk all of the Gs to rescan stacks rather than using the rescan list. We could also remove g.gcscanvalid, which is effectively a distributed rescan list. However, it's still useful for gcrescanstacks mode and it adds little complexity, so we'll leave it in. Fixes #17099. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I776d43f0729567335ef1bfd145b75c74de2cc7a9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36619 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
The wbshadow implementation was removed a year and a half ago in 1635ab7d, but the GODEBUG setting remained. Remove the GODEBUG setting since it doesn't do anything. Change-Id: I19cde324a79472aff60acb5cc9f7d4aa86c0c0ed Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36618 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Nathan Caza authored
The current implementation does not account for Dir being initialized with an absolute path on systems that start paths with filepath.Separator. In this scenario, the original error is returned, and not checked for file segments. This change adds a test for this case, and corrects the behavior by ignoring blank path segments in the loop. Refs #18984 Change-Id: I9b79fd0a73a46976c8e2feda0283ef0bb2b62ea1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36804Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
For vet. There are more. This is a start. Change-Id: Ibbbb2b20b5db60ee3fac4a1b5913d18fab01f6b9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36939 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Appease vet. Change-Id: Ie88de08b91041990c0eaf2e15628cdb98d40c660 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36938 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Makes vet happy. Change-Id: I7250f283c96e82b9796c5672a0a143ba7568fa63 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36937 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Dave Cheney authored
Alternatively the contents of str.go could be moved into fd_io_plan9.go Change-Id: I9d7ec85bbb376f4244eeca732f25c0b77cadc6a6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36971 Run-TryBot: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Dave Cheney authored
Change-Id: I283f4453e5cf8b22995b3abffccae182cfbb6945 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36970Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Caleb Spare authored
Fixes #18996 Change-Id: I0b0f7270960b368ce97ad4456f60bcc1fc2a8313 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36615 Run-TryBot: Caleb Spare <cespare@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
This occurs a fair amount in the runtime for non-power-of-two n. Use an alternative, faster formulation. name old time/op new time/op delta Fastrandn/2-8 4.45ns ± 2% 2.09ns ± 3% -53.12% (p=0.000 n=14+14) Fastrandn/3-8 4.78ns ±11% 2.06ns ± 2% -56.94% (p=0.000 n=15+15) Fastrandn/4-8 4.76ns ± 9% 1.99ns ± 3% -58.28% (p=0.000 n=15+13) Fastrandn/5-8 4.96ns ±13% 2.03ns ± 6% -59.14% (p=0.000 n=15+15) name old time/op new time/op delta SelectUncontended-8 33.7ns ± 2% 33.9ns ± 2% +0.70% (p=0.000 n=49+50) SelectSyncContended-8 1.68µs ± 4% 1.65µs ± 4% -1.54% (p=0.000 n=50+45) SelectAsyncContended-8 282ns ± 1% 277ns ± 1% -1.50% (p=0.000 n=48+43) SelectNonblock-8 5.31ns ± 1% 5.32ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.275 n=45+44) SelectProdCons-8 585ns ± 3% 577ns ± 2% -1.35% (p=0.000 n=50+50) GoroutineSelect-8 1.59ms ± 2% 1.59ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.084 n=49+48) Updates #16213 Change-Id: Ib555a4d7da2042a25c3976f76a436b536487d5b7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36932 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 13 Feb, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #19068. Change-Id: Id76037826376b5fe8b588fe3dc02182dfaff8c21 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36935 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Update #19062. Change-Id: I7397b573389145b56e73d2150ce0fc9aa75b3caa Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36934 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Change-Id: I62f9748b97bec245338ebf9686fbf6ad6dc6a9c2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36931 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Use distinction between explicit and automatically inserted semicolons to provide a better error message if the condition in an 'if' statement is missing. For #18747. Change-Id: Iac167ae4e5ad53d2dc73f746b4dee9912434bb59 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36930Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
Passes toolstash -cmp. Change-Id: Ida3eda9bd9d79a34c1c3f18cb41aea9392698076 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36950 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
It is not always obvious from the first glance when looking at TestAssembly failure in which context the code was generated. For example x86 and x86-64 are similar, and those of us who do not work with assembly every day can even take s390x version as something similar to x86. So when something fails lets print the whole test context - this includes os and arch which were previously missing. An example failure: before: --- FAIL: TestAssembly (40.48s) asm_test.go:46: expected: MOVWZ \(.*\), go: import "encoding/binary" func f(b []byte) uint32 { return binary.LittleEndian.Uint32(b) } asm:"".f t=1 size=160 args=0x20 locals=0x0 ... after: --- FAIL: TestAssembly (40.43s) asm_test.go:46: linux/s390x: expected: MOVWZ \(.*\), go: import "encoding/binary" func f(b []byte) uint32 { return binary.LittleEndian.Uint32(b) } asm:"".f t=1 size=160 args=0x20 locals=0x0 Motivated-by: #18946#issuecomment-279491071 Change-Id: I61089ceec05da7a165718a7d69dec4227dd0e993 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36881Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Sameer Ajmani authored
This eliminates the need for syscall/asm.s, which is now empty. Change-Id: Ied060195e03e9653251f54ea8ef6572444b37fdf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36844Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Sokolov Yura authored
Extend period of fastrand from (1<<31)-1 to (1<<32)-1 by choosing other polynom and reacting on high bit before shift. Polynomial is taken at https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/lfsr/index.html from 32.dat.gz . It is referred as F7711115 cause this list of polynomials is for LFSR with shift to right (and fastrand uses shift to left). (old polynomial is referred in 31.dat.gz as 7BB88888). There were couple of places with conversation of fastrand to int, which leads to negative values on 32bit platforms. They are fixed. Change-Id: Ibee518a3f9103e0aea220ada494b3aec77babb72 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36875 Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
Sameer Ajmani authored
I noticed that Content-Length may appear in http.Response.Header, but the docs say it should be omitted. Per discussion with bradfitz@, updating the docs to indicate that the struct fields are authoritative. Change-Id: Id1807ff9d4ba5de425d8b147205f29b18351230f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36842Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Michael Munday authored
MOVD{reg,nop} operations (added in CL 36256) inserted to preserve type information were blocking the load-combining rules. Fix this by merging type changes into loads wherever possible. Fixes #19059. Change-Id: I8a1df06eb0f231b40ae43107d4a3bd0b9c441b59 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36843 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-