- 29 Oct, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Alberto Donizetti authored
Change-Id: I017c2ef7cc6248d3f4e38a791cd2576e941984ed Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32156 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Emmanuel Odeke authored
Improves the error message by moving the field name before the body of a struct, in the error message for unknown fields for structs. * Exhibit: Given program: package main import "time" func main() { _ = struct { about string before map[string]uint update map[string]int updateTime time.Time expect map[string]int }{ about: "this one", updates: map[string]int{"gopher": 10}, } } * Before: ./issue17631.go:20: unknown struct { about string; before map[string]uint; update map[string]int; updateTime time.Time; expect map[string]int } field 'updates' in struct literal * After: ./issue17631.go:20: unknown field 'updates' in struct literal of type { about string; before map[string]uint; update map[string]int; updateTime time.Time; expect map[string]int } Fixes #17631 Change-Id: I76842616411b931b5ad7a76bd42860dfde7739f4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32240Reviewed-by:
Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
-
Dmitry Vyukov authored
I did 'export GORACE=atexit_sleep_ms=0' in a console and then was puzzled as to why race tests fail. Existing GORACE env var may (or may not) override the one that we setup. Filter out GORACE as we do for other important env vars. Change-Id: I29be86b0cbb9b5dc7f9efb15729ade86fc79b0e0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32163Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Than McIntosh authored
Change-Id: Iec35f9b62982da40de400397bc456149216303dc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32297Reviewed-by:
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Martin Möhrmann authored
Change-Id: Icea4661db4a254e64b2129f429e5ef21ec1612cb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32162 Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
-
- 28 Oct, 2016 35 commits
-
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
The docs used to imply that using == would compare Locations, but of course it just compares Location pointers, which will have unpredictable results depending on how the pointers are loaded. Change-Id: I783c1309e476a9616a1c1c290eac713aba3b0b57 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32332Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
Updates #15228. Change-Id: Iefdffa146703ee1c04afc2b71d9de1f0a0811f86 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32146 Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
Fixes #17623. Change-Id: I4717e8399f955c9be7ba19108bb0bcc108187c04 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32147 Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Peter Weinberger authored
On solaris/amd64 sometimes the reported cycle count is negative. Replace with 0. Change-Id: I364eea5ca072281245c7ab3afb0bf69adc3a8eae Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32258Reviewed-by:
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
Use "have" and "want" and multiple lines like other similar error messages. Also, fix handling of ... and multi-value function calls. Fixes #17650. Change-Id: I4850e79c080eac8df3b92a4accf9e470dff63c9a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32261Reviewed-by:
Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
On amd64p32, rt0_go attempts to reserve 128 bytes of scratch space on the stack, but due to a register mixup this ends up being a no-op. Fix this so we actually reserve the stack space. Change-Id: I04dbfbeb44f3109528c8ec74e1136bc00d7e1faa Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32331 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
With the hybrid barrier in place, we can now disable stack rescanning by default. This commit adds a "gcrescanstacks" GODEBUG variable that is off by default but can be set to re-enable STW stack rescanning. The plan is to leave this off but available in Go 1.8 for debugging and as a fallback. With this change, worst-case mark termination time at GOMAXPROCS=12 *not* including time spent stopping the world (which is still unbounded) is reliably under 100 µs, with a 95%ile around 50 µs in every benchmark I tried (the go1 benchmarks, the x/benchmarks garbage benchmark, and the gcbench activegs and rpc benchmarks). Including time spent stopping the world usually adds about 20 µs to total STW time at GOMAXPROCS=12, but I've seen it add around 150 µs in these benchmarks when a goroutine takes time to reach a safe point (see issue #10958) or when stopping the world races with goroutine switches. At GOMAXPROCS=1, where this isn't an issue, worst case STW is typically 30 µs. The go-gcbench activegs benchmark is designed to stress large numbers of dirty stacks. This commit reduces 95%ile STW time for 500k dirty stacks by nearly three orders of magnitude, from 150ms to 195µs. This has little effect on the throughput of the go1 benchmarks or the x/benchmarks benchmarks. name old time/op new time/op delta XGarbage-12 2.31ms ± 0% 2.32ms ± 1% +0.28% (p=0.001 n=17+16) XJSON-12 12.4ms ± 0% 12.4ms ± 0% +0.41% (p=0.000 n=18+18) XHTTP-12 11.8µs ± 0% 11.8µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.492 n=20+18) It reduces the tail latency of the x/benchmarks HTTP benchmark: name old p50-time new p50-time delta XHTTP-12 489µs ± 0% 491µs ± 1% +0.54% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old p95-time new p95-time delta XHTTP-12 957µs ± 1% 960µs ± 1% +0.28% (p=0.002 n=20+17) name old p99-time new p99-time delta XHTTP-12 1.76ms ± 1% 1.64ms ± 1% -7.20% (p=0.000 n=20+18) Comparing to the beginning of the hybrid barrier implementation ("runtime: parallelize STW mcache flushing") shows that the hybrid barrier trades a small performance impact for much better STW latency, as expected. The magnitude of the performance impact is generally small: name old time/op new time/op delta BinaryTree17-12 2.37s ± 1% 2.42s ± 1% +2.04% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Fannkuch11-12 2.84s ± 0% 2.72s ± 0% -4.00% (p=0.000 n=19+19) FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.2ns ± 1% 45.2ns ± 1% +2.20% (p=0.000 n=17+19) FmtFprintfString-12 130ns ± 1% 134ns ± 0% +2.94% (p=0.000 n=18+16) FmtFprintfInt-12 114ns ± 1% 117ns ± 0% +3.01% (p=0.000 n=19+15) FmtFprintfIntInt-12 176ns ± 1% 182ns ± 0% +3.17% (p=0.000 n=20+15) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 186ns ± 1% 187ns ± 1% +1.04% (p=0.000 n=20+19) FmtFprintfFloat-12 251ns ± 1% 250ns ± 1% -0.74% (p=0.000 n=17+18) FmtManyArgs-12 746ns ± 1% 761ns ± 0% +2.08% (p=0.000 n=19+20) GobDecode-12 6.57ms ± 1% 6.65ms ± 1% +1.11% (p=0.000 n=19+20) GobEncode-12 5.59ms ± 1% 5.65ms ± 0% +1.08% (p=0.000 n=17+17) Gzip-12 223ms ± 1% 223ms ± 1% -0.31% (p=0.006 n=20+20) Gunzip-12 38.0ms ± 0% 37.9ms ± 1% -0.25% (p=0.009 n=19+20) HTTPClientServer-12 77.5µs ± 1% 78.9µs ± 2% +1.89% (p=0.000 n=20+20) JSONEncode-12 14.7ms ± 1% 14.9ms ± 0% +0.75% (p=0.000 n=20+20) JSONDecode-12 53.0ms ± 1% 55.9ms ± 1% +5.54% (p=0.000 n=19+19) Mandelbrot200-12 3.81ms ± 0% 3.81ms ± 1% +0.20% (p=0.023 n=17+19) GoParse-12 3.17ms ± 1% 3.18ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.057 n=20+19) RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 71.7ns ± 1% 70.4ns ± 1% -1.77% (p=0.000 n=19+20) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 946ns ± 0% 946ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.405 n=18+18) RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 67.2ns ± 2% 67.3ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.732 n=20+20) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 374ns ± 1% 378ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+19) RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.259 n=18+20) RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 34.2µs ± 1% 34.5µs ± 1% +1.03% (p=0.000 n=18+18) RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.77µs ± 1% 1.79µs ± 1% +0.73% (p=0.000 n=19+18) RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 53.6µs ± 1% 54.2µs ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) Template-12 61.5ms ± 1% 63.9ms ± 0% +3.96% (p=0.000 n=18+18) TimeParse-12 303ns ± 1% 300ns ± 1% -1.08% (p=0.000 n=19+20) TimeFormat-12 318ns ± 1% 320ns ± 0% +0.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19) Revcomp-12 (*) 509ms ± 3% 504ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.967 n=7+12) [Geo mean] 54.3µs 54.8µs +0.88% (*) Revcomp is highly non-linear, so I only took samples with 2 iterations. name old time/op new time/op delta XGarbage-12 2.25ms ± 0% 2.32ms ± 1% +2.74% (p=0.000 n=16+16) XJSON-12 11.6ms ± 0% 12.4ms ± 0% +6.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18) XHTTP-12 11.6µs ± 1% 11.8µs ± 1% +1.62% (p=0.000 n=17+18) Updates #17503. Updates #17099, since you can't have a rescan list bug if there's no rescan list. I'm not marking it as fixed, since gcrescanstacks can still be set to re-enable the rescan lists. Change-Id: I6e926b4c2dbd4cd56721869d4f817bdbb330b851 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31766Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This implements the unconditional version of the hybrid deletion write barrier, which always shades both the old and new pointer. It's unconditional for now because barriers on channel operations require checking both the source and destination stacks and we don't have a way to funnel this information into the write barrier at the moment. As part of this change, we modify the typed memclr operations introduced earlier to invoke the write barrier. This has basically no overall effect on benchmark performance. This is good, since it indicates that neither the extra shade nor the new bulk clear barriers have much effect. It also has little effect on latency. This is expected, since we haven't yet modified mark termination to take advantage of the hybrid barrier. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Iebedf84af2f0e857bd5d3a2d525f760b5cf7224b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31765Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
With the hybrid barrier, unless we're doing a STW GC or hit a very rare race (~once per all.bash) that can start mark termination before all of the work is drained, we don't need to drain the work queue at all. Even draining an empty work queue is rather expensive since we have to enter the getfull() barrier, so it's worth avoiding this. Conveniently, it's quite easy to detect whether or not we actually need the getufull() barrier: since the world is stopped when we enter mark termination, everything must have flushed its work to the work queue, so we can just check the queue. If the queue is empty and we haven't queued up any jobs that may create more work (which should always be the case with the hybrid barrier), we can simply have all GC workers perform non-blocking drains. Also conveniently, this solution is quite safe. If we do somehow screw something up and there's work on the work queue, some worker will still process it, it just may not happen in parallel. This is not the "right" solution, but it's simple, expedient, low-risk, and maintains compatibility with debug.gcrescanstacks. When we remove the gcrescanstacks fallback in Go 1.9, we should also fix the race that starts mark termination early, and then we can eliminate work draining from mark termination. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I7b3cd5de6a248ab29d78c2b42aed8b7443641361 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32186Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently bulkBarrierPreWrite calls writebarrierptr_prewrite, but this means that we check writeBarrier.needed twice and perform cgo checks twice. Change bulkBarrierPreWrite to call writebarrierptr_prewrite1 to skip over these duplicate checks. This may speed up bulkBarrierPreWrite slightly, but mostly this will save us from running out of nosplit stack space on ppc64x in the near future. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I1cea1a2207e884ab1a279c6a5e378dcdc048b63e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31890Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
gobuf.ctxt is set to nil from many places in assembly code and these assignments require write barriers with the hybrid barrier. Conveniently, in most of these places ctxt should already be nil, in which case we don't need the barrier. This commit changes these places to assert that ctxt is already nil. gogo is more complicated, since ctxt may not already be nil. For gogo, we manually perform the write barrier if ctxt is not nil. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I9d75e27c75a1b7f8b715ad112fc5d45ffa856d30 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31764Reviewed-by:
Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, we perform write barriers after performing pointer writes. At the moment, it simply doesn't matter what order this happens in, as long as they appear atomic to GC. But both the hybrid barrier and ROC are going to require a pre-write write barrier. For the hybrid barrier, this is important because the barrier needs to observe both the current value of the slot and the value that will be written to it. (Alternatively, the caller could do the write and pass in the old value, but it seems easier and more useful to just swap the order of the barrier and the write.) For ROC, this is necessary because, if the pointer write is going to make the pointer reachable to some goroutine that it currently is not visible to, the garbage collector must take some special action before that pointer becomes more broadly visible. This commits swaps pointer writes around so the write barrier occurs before the pointer write. The main subtlety here is bulk memory writes. Currently, these copy to the destination first and then use the pointer bitmap of the destination to find the copied pointers and invoke the write barrier. This is necessary because the source may not have a pointer bitmap. To handle these, we pass both the source and the destination to the bulk memory barrier, which uses the pointer bitmap of the destination, but reads the pointer values from the source. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I78ecc0c5c94ee81c29019c305b3d232069294a55 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31763Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
We reject import of main packages, but we missed tests. Reject in all tests except test of that main package. We reject local (relative) imports from code with a non-local import path, but again we missed tests. Reject those too. Fixes #14811. Fixes #15795. Fixes #17475. Change-Id: I535ff26889520276a891904f54f1a85b2c40207d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31821 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Change-Id: I2a710f0e9b484b3dfc581d3a9a23aa13321ec267 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32316 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Cherry Zhang authored
Materialize float constant 0 from integer zero register, instead of loading from constant pool. Also fix assembling FMOV from zero register to FP register. Change-Id: Ie413dd342cedebdb95ba8cfc220e23ed2a39e885 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32250 Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
David Chase <drchase@google.com>
-
Cherry Zhang authored
Apparently on macOS Sierra LLDB thinks /usr/lib/dyld is mapped at address 0, even if Go code starts at 0x1000, and it looks up addresses from dyld which shadows Go symbols. Move Go binary at a higher address to avoid clash. Fixes #17463. Re-enable TestLldbPython. Change-Id: I89ca6f3ee48aa6da9862bfa0c2da91477cc93255 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32185 Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Several of our current write barrier elision optimizations are invalid with the hybrid barrier. Eliding the hybrid barrier requires that *both* the current and new pointer be already shaded and, since we don't have the flow analysis to figure out anything about the slot's current value, for now we have to just disable several of these optimizations. This has a slight impact on binary size. On linux/amd64, the go tool binary increases by 0.7% and the compile binary increases by 1.5%. It also has a slight impact on performance, as one would expect. We'll win some of this back in subsequent commits. name old time/op new time/op delta BinaryTree17-12 2.38s ± 1% 2.40s ± 1% +0.82% (p=0.000 n=18+20) Fannkuch11-12 2.84s ± 1% 2.70s ± 0% -4.97% (p=0.000 n=18+18) FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.2ns ± 1% 46.4ns ± 2% +4.89% (p=0.000 n=16+18) FmtFprintfString-12 131ns ± 0% 134ns ± 1% +2.05% (p=0.000 n=12+19) FmtFprintfInt-12 114ns ± 1% 117ns ± 1% +3.26% (p=0.000 n=19+20) FmtFprintfIntInt-12 176ns ± 1% 181ns ± 1% +3.25% (p=0.000 n=20+20) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 185ns ± 1% 190ns ± 1% +2.77% (p=0.000 n=19+18) FmtFprintfFloat-12 249ns ± 1% 254ns ± 1% +1.71% (p=0.000 n=18+20) FmtManyArgs-12 747ns ± 1% 743ns ± 1% -0.58% (p=0.000 n=19+18) GobDecode-12 6.57ms ± 1% 6.61ms ± 0% +0.73% (p=0.000 n=19+20) GobEncode-12 5.58ms ± 1% 5.60ms ± 0% +0.27% (p=0.001 n=18+18) Gzip-12 223ms ± 1% 223ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.351 n=19+20) Gunzip-12 37.9ms ± 0% 37.9ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=16+20) HTTPClientServer-12 77.8µs ± 1% 78.5µs ± 1% +0.97% (p=0.000 n=19+20) JSONEncode-12 14.8ms ± 1% 14.8ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.079 n=20+19) JSONDecode-12 53.7ms ± 1% 54.2ms ± 1% +0.92% (p=0.000 n=20+19) Mandelbrot200-12 3.81ms ± 1% 3.81ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.916 n=19+18) GoParse-12 3.19ms ± 1% 3.19ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.175 n=20+19) RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 71.9ns ± 1% 70.6ns ± 1% -1.87% (p=0.000 n=19+20) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 946ns ± 0% 944ns ± 0% -0.22% (p=0.000 n=19+16) RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 67.3ns ± 2% 66.8ns ± 1% -0.72% (p=0.008 n=20+20) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 374ns ± 1% 384ns ± 1% +2.69% (p=0.000 n=18+20) RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=20+20) RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 34.3µs ± 1% 34.6µs ± 1% +0.90% (p=0.000 n=20+20) RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.78µs ± 1% 1.80µs ± 1% +1.45% (p=0.000 n=20+19) RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 53.6µs ± 0% 54.5µs ± 1% +1.52% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Revcomp-12 417ms ± 5% 391ms ± 1% -6.42% (p=0.000 n=16+19) Template-12 61.1ms ± 1% 64.2ms ± 0% +5.07% (p=0.000 n=19+20) TimeParse-12 302ns ± 1% 305ns ± 1% +0.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18) TimeFormat-12 319ns ± 1% 315ns ± 1% -1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18) [Geo mean] 54.0µs 54.3µs +0.58% name old time/op new time/op delta XGarbage-12 2.24ms ± 2% 2.28ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+17) XHTTP-12 11.4µs ± 1% 11.6µs ± 2% +1.63% (p=0.000 n=18+18) XJSON-12 11.6ms ± 0% 12.5ms ± 0% +7.84% (p=0.000 n=18+17) Updates #17503. Change-Id: I1899f8e35662971e24bf692b517dfbe2b533c00c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31572Reviewed-by:
Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
As for dropg, save is writing a nil pointer that will generate a write barrier with the hybrid barrier. However, in this case, ctxt always should already be nil, so replace the write with an assertion that this is the case. At this point, we're ready to disable the write barrier elision optimizations that interfere with the hybrid barrier. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I83208e65aa33403d442401f355b2e013ab9a50e9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31571Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently this contains no write barriers because it's writing nil pointers, but with the hybrid barrier, even these will produce write barriers. However, since these are *gs and *ms, they don't need write barriers, so we can simply eliminate them. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Ib188a60492c5cfb352814bf9b2bcb2941fb7d6c0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31570Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
The hybrid barrier requires allocate-black, but there's one case where we don't currently allocate black: the tiny allocator. If we allocate a *new* tiny alloc block during GC, it will be allocated black, but if we allocated the current block before GC, it won't be black, and the further allocations from it won't mark it, which means we may free a reachable tiny block during sweeping. Fix this by passing over all mcaches at the beginning of mark, while the world is still stopped, and greying their tiny blocks. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I04d4df7cc2f553f8f7b1e4cb0b52e2946588111a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31456Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
The hybrid barrier requires barriers on stack-to-stack copies if either stack is grey. There are only two instances of this in the runtime: channel sends and starting a goroutine. Channel sends already use typedmemmove and hence have the necessary barriers. This commits adds barriers for the stack-to-stack copy when starting a goroutine. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Ibb55e08127ca4d021ac54be61cb96732efa5df5b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31455Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Michael Matloob authored
Change-Id: Ia511b0aadc87eb53e084d14cdb90ba4be958a43e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32259Reviewed-by:
Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Michael Matloob authored
Original Change by Daria Kolistratova <daria.kolistratova@intel.com> Added functions with suffix proto and stuff from pprof tool to translate to protobuf. Done as the profile proto is more extensible than the legacy pprof format and is pprof's preferred profile format. Large part was taken from https://github.com/google/pprof tool. Tested by hand and compared the result with translated by pprof tool, profiles are identical. Fixes #16093 Change-Id: I2751345b09a66ee2b6aa64be76cba4cd1c326aa6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32257 Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #17342. Change-Id: I76af756d7aff464554c5564d444962a468d0eccc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32172 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #16164. Change-Id: Ic8f51ebd8235640143913a07b70f5b41ee061fe4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32114Reviewed-by:
Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Waiting 2ms for all the kicked-off goroutines to run and block seems a little optimistic. No harm done by waiting for 200ms instead. Fixes #17238. Change-Id: I827532ea2f5f1f3ed04179f8957dd2c563946ed0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32103 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #6639. Change-Id: Iefce87c5521504fd41843df8462cfd840c24410f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32102 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Quentin Smith authored
Fixes #17536 Change-Id: Ica8c3d696848822ac65b7931455b1fd94809bfe8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31710Reviewed-by:
Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently we initialize LR on a new stack by writing nil to it. But this is an initializing write since the newly allocated stack is not zeroed, so this is unsafe with the hybrid barrier. Change this is a uintptr write to avoid a bad write barrier. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I062ac352e35df7da4644c1f2a5aaab87049d1f60 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32093Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
We reuse finalizers in finblocks, which are allocated off-heap. This means they have to be zero-initialized before becoming visible to the garbage collector. We actually already do this by clearing the finalizer before returning it to the pool, but we're not careful to enforce correct memory ordering. Fix this by manipulating the finalizer count atomically so these writes synchronize properly with the garbage collector. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I7797d31df3c656c9fe654bc6da287f66a9e2037d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31454Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
runfinq allocates a stack frame on the heap for constructing the finalizer function calls and reuses it for each call. However, because the type of this frame is constantly shifting, it tells mallocgc there are no pointers in it and it acts essentially like uninitialized memory between uses. But runfinq uses pointer writes with write barriers to "initialize" this memory, which is not going to be safe with the hybrid barrier, since the hybrid barrier may see a stale pointer left in the "uninitialized" frame. Fix this by zero-initializing the argument values in the frame before writing the argument pointers. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I951c0a2be427eb9082a32d65c4410e6fdef041be Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31453Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Updates #17503. Change-Id: I109d8742358ae983fdff3f3dbb7136973e81f4c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31452Reviewed-by:
Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, zeroing generates an ssa.OpZero, which never has write barriers, even if the assignment is an OASWB. The hybrid barrier requires write barriers on zeroing, so change OASWB to generate an ssa.OpZeroWB when assigning the zero value, which turns into a typedmemclr. Updates #17503. Change-Id: Ib37ac5e39f578447dbd6b36a6a54117d5624784d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31451Reviewed-by:
Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
If a slice's backing store has pointers, we need to lower clears of that slice to memclrHasPointers instead of memclrNoHeapPointers. Updates #17503. Change-Id: I20750e4bf57f7b8862f3d898bfb32d964b91d07b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31450Reviewed-by:
Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
The basic structure of Part.Read should be simple: do what you can with the current buffered data, reading more as you need it. Make it that way. Working entirely in the bufio.Reader's buffer eliminates the need for an additional bytes.Buffer. This structure should be easier to extend in the future as more special cases arise. Change-Id: I83cb24a755a1767c4c037f9ece6716460c3ecd01 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32092 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by:
Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-