- 19 May, 2015 9 commits
-
-
Ryan Brown authored
Fixes #8973 Change-Id: Idd53fc6d9e6971ae31ed72a3df3cfdce0bfbc1fd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8661Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I348223d0336e28d95b8e68d7653aa547acc7c9c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10262Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #8745. Change-Id: Id0641e3c0f259812b41ed871e83c68740feb2b19 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10261Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Rick Hudson authored
Prior to this CL whenever the GC marking was enabled and a P was looking for work we supplied a G to help the GC do its marking tasks. Once this G finished all the marking available it would release the P to find another available G. In the case where there was no work the P would drop into findrunnable which would execute the mark helper G which would immediately return and the P would drop into findrunnable again repeating the process. Since the P was always given a G to run it never blocks. This CL first checks if the GC mark helper G has available work and if not the P immediately falls through to its blocking logic. Fixes #10901 Change-Id: I94ac9646866ba64b7892af358888bc9950de23b5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10189Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently setGCPercent sets heapminimum to heapminimum*GOGC/100. The real intent is to set heapminimum to a scaled multiple of a fixed default heap minimum, not to scale heapminimum based on its current value. This turns out to be okay because setGCPercent is only called once and heapminimum is initially set to this default heap minimum. However, the code as written is confusing, especially since setGCPercent is otherwise written so it could be called again to change GOGC. Fix this by introducing a defaultHeapMinimum constant and using this instead of the current value of heapminimum to compute the scaled heap minimum. As part of this, this commit improves the documentation on heapminimum. Change-Id: I4eb82c73dc2eb44a6e5a17c780a747a2e73d7493 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10181Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Addresses a problem reported on the mailing list. This will come up mainly in programs custom allocators that batch allocations, but it still helps in our programs, which mainly do not have such allocations. name old mean new mean delta BinaryTree17 5.95s × (0.97,1.03) 5.93s × (0.97,1.04) ~ (p=0.613) Fannkuch11 4.46s × (0.98,1.04) 4.33s × (0.99,1.01) -2.93% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfEmpty 86.6ns × (0.98,1.03) 86.8ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.523) FmtFprintfString 290ns × (0.98,1.05) 287ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.061) FmtFprintfInt 271ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.99,1.01) +5.54% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfIntInt 495ns × (0.98,1.04) 489ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.24% (p=0.015) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 391ns × (0.99,1.02) 407ns × (0.99,1.01) +4.00% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfFloat 578ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.35% (p=0.000) FmtManyArgs 1.96µs × (0.98,1.05) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.33% (p=0.030) GobDecode 15.9ms × (0.97,1.05) 15.7ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.35% (p=0.044) GobEncode 11.4ms × (0.97,1.05) 11.3ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.141) Gzip 658ms × (0.98,1.05) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.59% (p=0.009) Gunzip 144ms × (0.99,1.03) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.867) HTTPClientServer 92.1µs × (0.97,1.05) 90.3µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.89% (p=0.005) JSONEncode 31.0ms × (0.96,1.07) 30.2ms × (0.98,1.03) -2.66% (p=0.001) JSONDecode 110ms × (0.97,1.04) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.59% (p=0.000) Mandelbrot200 6.15ms × (0.98,1.04) 6.07ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.32% (p=0.045) GoParse 6.79ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.74ms × (0.97,1.04) ~ (p=0.242) RegexpMatchEasy0_32 158ns × (0.98,1.05) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.64% (p=0.010) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 548ns × (0.97,1.04) 540ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.34% (p=0.042) RegexpMatchEasy1_32 133ns × (0.97,1.04) 132ns × (0.97,1.05) ~ (p=0.466) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 899ns × (0.96,1.05) 878ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.32% (p=0.002) RegexpMatchMedium_32 250ns × (0.96,1.03) 243ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.90% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.4µs × (0.98,1.04) 73.0µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.411) RegexpMatchHard_32 3.87µs × (0.97,1.07) 3.84µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.273) RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.97,1.08) 117µs × (0.99,1.01) -2.06% (p=0.010) Revcomp 940ms × (0.96,1.07) 924ms × (0.97,1.07) ~ (p=0.071) Template 128ms × (0.96,1.05) 128ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.502) TimeParse 632ns × (0.96,1.07) 616ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.58% (p=0.001) TimeFormat 671ns × (0.97,1.06) 657ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.10% (p=0.002) In contrast to the one in test/bench/go1 (above), the binarytree program on the shootout site uses more goroutines, batches allocations, and sets GOMAXPROCS to runtime.NumCPU()*2. Using that version, before vs after: name old mean new mean delta BinaryTree20 18.6s × (0.96,1.05) 11.3s × (0.98,1.02) -39.46% (p=0.000) And Go 1.4 vs after: name old mean new mean delta BinaryTree20 13.0s × (0.97,1.02) 11.3s × (0.98,1.02) -13.21% (p=0.000) There is still a scheduling problem - the raw run times are hiding the fact that this chews up 2x the CPU - but we'll take care of that separately. Change-Id: I3f5da879b24ae73a0d06745381ffb88c3744948b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10220Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #10897. Change-Id: I5c2d1f9d26333e2b2a0613ebf496daa465e07c24 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10221Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Shenghou Ma authored
Fixes #10906. Change-Id: I7ae25a500df493c1e78183d69d89b3e2a64a0d1a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10223Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
Aaron Jacobs authored
I think "the flag" was a typo, and the word "after" was repetitive. Change-Id: I81c034ca11a3a778ff1eb4b3af5b96bc525ab985 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10195Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
- 18 May, 2015 16 commits
-
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Rearrange Node fields to enable better struct packing. This reduces readability in favor of shrinking the size of Nodes. This reduces the size of Node from 328 to 312. This reduces the memory usage to compile the rotate tests by about 4.4%. No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp. Updates #9933. Change-Id: I2764c5847fb1635ddc898e2ee385d007d67f03c5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10141Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Param will be converted from an anonymous to a named field in a subsequent, automated CL. Reduces Node size from 368 to 328. Reduces inuse_space on the rotate tests by about 3%. No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp. Updates #9933. Change-Id: I5867b00328abf17ee24aea6ca58876bae9d8bfed Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10210Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Change-Id: Ifda5d84b28717986c93b63767298180a6d6236c0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10140Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
Funcdepth was already int32. Make Escloopdepth and Decldepth also int32 instead of int. No functional changes for non-absurd code. Passes toolstash -cmp. Change-Id: I47e145dd732b6a73cfcc6d45956df0dbccdcd999 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10129Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
This is a duplicate of CL 9491. That CL broke the build due to pprof shortcomings and was reverted in CL 9565. CL 9623 fixed pprof, so this can go in again. Fixes #10659. Change-Id: If470fc90b3db2ade1d161b4417abd2f5c6c330b8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10212Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
Daniel Morsing authored
Fixes #10659. Change-Id: I22dc306ce6f398dd40010ac430928a718d67d466 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9623Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Rob Pike authored
Better layout. Fixes #10859. The issue suggests rearranging so the comment comes out after the methods. I tried this and it looks good but it is less useful, since the stuff you're probably looking for - the methods - are scrolled away by the comment. The most important information should be last because that leaves it on your screen after the print if the output is long. Change-Id: I560f992601ccbe2293c347fa1b1018a3f5346c82 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10160Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
And fix to work on filesystems with only 1s resolution. Fixes #10724 Change-Id: Ia07463f090b4290fc27f5953fa94186463d7afc7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9768Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Fixes #10893. Change-Id: I8afeb55acda1e1c8e181379dbaf443716d63ded1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10201Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
David Chase authored
Modified esc.go to allow slice literals (before append) to be non-escaping. Modified tests to account for changes in escape behavior and to also test the two cases that were previously not tested. Also minor cleanups to debug-printing within esc.go Allocation stats for running compiler ( cd src/html/template; for i in {1..5} ; do go tool 6g -memprofile=testzz.${i}.prof -memprofilerate=1 *.go ; go tool pprof -alloc_objects -text testzz.${i}.prof ; done ; ) before about 86k allocations after about 83k allocations Fixes #8972 Change-Id: Ib61dd70dc74adb40d6f6fdda6eaa4bf7d83481de Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10118Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, forEachP reuses the stopwait and stopnote fields from stopTheWorld to track how many Ps have not responded to the safe-point request and to sleep until all Ps have responded. It was assumed this was safe because both stopTheWorld and forEachP must occur under the worlsema and hence stopwait and stopnote cannot be used for both purposes simultaneously and callers could always determine the appropriate use based on sched.gcwaiting (which is only set by stopTheWorld). However, this is not the case, since it's possible for there to be a window between when an M observes that gcwaiting is set and when it checks stopwait during which stopwait could have changed meanings. When this happens, the M decrements stopwait and may wakeup stopnote, but does not otherwise participate in the forEachP protocol. As a result, stopwait is decremented too many times, so it may reach zero before all Ps have run the safe-point function, causing forEachP to wake up early. It will then either observe that some P has not run the safe-point function and panic with "P did not run fn", or the remaining P (or Ps) will run the safe-point function before it wakes up and it will observe that stopwait is negative and panic with "not stopped". Fix this problem by giving forEachP its own safePointWait and safePointNote fields. One known sequence of events that can cause this race is as follows. It involves three actors: G1 is running on M1 on P1. P1 has an empty run queue. G2/M2 is in a blocked syscall and has lost its P. (The details of this don't matter, it just needs to be in a position where it needs to grab an idle P.) GC just started on G3/M3/P3. (These aren't very involved, they just have to be separate from the other G's, M's, and P's.) 1. GC calls stopTheWorld(), which sets sched.gcwaiting to 1. Now G1/M1 begins to enter a syscall: 2. G1/M1 invokes reentersyscall, which sets the P1's status to _Psyscall. 3. G1/M1's reentersyscall observes gcwaiting != 0 and calls entersyscall_gcwait. 4. G1/M1's entersyscall_gcwait blocks acquiring sched.lock. Back on GC: 5. stopTheWorld cas's P1's status to _Pgcstop, does other stuff, and returns. 6. GC does stuff and then calls startTheWorld(). 7. startTheWorld() calls procresize(), which sets P1's status to _Pidle and puts P1 on the idle list. Now G2/M2 returns from its syscall and takes over P1: 8. G2/M2 returns from its blocked syscall and gets P1 from the idle list. 9. G2/M2 acquires P1, which sets P1's status to _Prunning. 10. G2/M2 starts a new syscall and invokes reentersyscall, which sets P1's status to _Psyscall. Back on G1/M1: 11. G1/M1 finally acquires sched.lock in entersyscall_gcwait. At this point, G1/M1 still thinks it's running on P1. P1's status is _Psyscall, which is consistent with what G1/M1 is doing, but it's _Psyscall because *G2/M2* put it in to _Psyscall, not G1/M1. This is basically an ABA race on P1's status. Because forEachP currently shares stopwait with stopTheWorld. G1/M1's entersyscall_gcwait observes the non-zero stopwait set by forEachP, but mistakes it for a stopTheWorld. It cas's P1's status from _Psyscall (set by G2/M2) to _Pgcstop and proceeds to decrement stopwait one more time than forEachP was expecting. Fixes #10618. (See the issue for details on why the above race is safe when forEachP is not involved.) Prior to this commit, the command stress ./runtime.test -test.run TestFutexsleep\|TestGoroutineProfile would reliably fail after a few hundred runs. With this commit, it ran for over 2 million runs and never crashed. Change-Id: I9a91ea20035b34b6e5f07ef135b144115f281f30 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10157Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, startTheWorld releases worldsema before starting the world. Since startTheWorld can change gomaxprocs after allowing Ps to run, this means that gomaxprocs can change while another P holds worldsema. Unfortunately, the garbage collector and forEachP assume that holding worldsema protects against changes in gomaxprocs (which it *almost* does). In particular, this is causing somewhat frequent "P did not run fn" crashes in forEachP in the runtime tests because gomaxprocs is changing between the several loops that forEachP does over all the Ps. Fix this by only releasing worldsema after the world is started. This relates to issue #10618. forEachP still fails under stress testing, but much less frequently. Change-Id: I085d627b70cca9ebe9af28fe73b9872f1bb224ff Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10156Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, startTheWorld clears preemptoff for the current M before starting the world. A few callers increment m.locks around startTheWorld, presumably to prevent preemption any time during starting the world. This is almost certainly pointless (none of the other callers do this), but there's no harm in making startTheWorld keep preemption disabled until it's all done, which definitely lets us drop these m.locks manipulations. Change-Id: I8a93658abd0c72276c9bafa3d2c7848a65b4691a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10155Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
There are several steps to stopping and starting the world and currently they're open-coded in several places. The garbage collector is the only thing that needs to stop and start the world in a non-trivial pattern. Replace all other uses with calls to higher-level functions that implement the entire pattern necessary to stop and start the world. This is a pure refectoring and should not change any code semantics. In the following commits, we'll make changes that are easier to do with this abstraction in place. This commit renames the old starttheworld to startTheWorldWithSema. This is a slight misnomer right now because the callers release worldsema just before calling this. However, a later commit will swap these and I don't want to think of another name in the mean time. Change-Id: I5dc97f87b44fb98963c49c777d7053653974c911 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10154Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
In order to avoid deadlocks, startGC avoids kicking off GC if locks are held by the calling M. However, it currently fails to check preemptoff, which is the other way to disable preemption. Fix this by adding a check for preemptoff. Change-Id: Ie1083166e5ba4af5c9d6c5a42efdfaaef41ca997 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10153Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Alex Brainman authored
It is misleading when stack trace say: signal arrived during cgo execution but we are not in cgo call. Change-Id: I627e2f2bdc7755074677f77f21befc070a101914 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9190Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
- 17 May, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Shenghou Ma authored
If make.bash fails, there is no point continuing any further. Fixes #10880. Change-Id: I350cc16999372422ad3d2e0327d52d467886a5b1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10180Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, runqsteal steals Gs from another P into an intermediate buffer and then copies those Gs into the current P's run queue. This intermediate buffer itself was moved from the stack to the P in commit c4fe5031 to eliminate the cost of zeroing it on every steal. This commit follows up c4fe5031 by stealing directly into the current P's run queue, which eliminates the copy and the need for the intermediate buffer. The update to the tail pointer is only committed once the entire steal operation has succeeded, so the semantics of stealing do not change. Change-Id: Icdd7a0eb82668980bf42c0154b51eef6419fdd51 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9998Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Shenghou Ma authored
Fixes #10336. Change-Id: Idc3f60851aea590575dc293165d4d6f85ae001bc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9645Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 16 May, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I2ebb36c6c5de9d34e52ed523e9c888452591924a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10152Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: Ie67e295bf327126dfdc75b73979fe33fbcb79ad9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10150Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries, and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense: if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB (for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep one in memory during the execution of the program. For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation, called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined. This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information, in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster decoding compared to the old form. Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type: (1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes; store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it. (1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary, fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the binary and copy from it. (2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words, or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling), then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask. Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask. (3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated. (This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.) Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases: (1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even), store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.) (2) There is no case 2 anymore. (3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated. Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above) was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly. Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs and their space savings. Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL: name old mean new mean delta SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179) SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001) SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001) SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000) SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001) SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070) SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015) SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069) SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767) SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001) SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001) SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000) The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly. Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm. The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024, along with the slice variants of those. It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case. Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL: name old mean new mean delta SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000) SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000) SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000) SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation. Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case, so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps. SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation. Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case, so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and I've seen >20x on other systems). Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4. The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL. Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL: name old mean new mean delta BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306) Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006) FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280) FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039) FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533) FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000) FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000) GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609) GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000) Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835) Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169) HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045) JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549) JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000) Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878) GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004) RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088) RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157) RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021) RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539) RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378) RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067) Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943) Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000) TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000) TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976) For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL: name old mean new mean delta BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000) Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212) FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203) FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000) FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000) FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000) GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000) GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000) Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000) Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204) HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000) JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001) JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000) Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184) GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003) RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000) RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000) Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083) Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000) TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000) TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000) This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime, and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs, so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least while keeping the build working at each change). Fixes #9625. Fixes #10524. Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Didier Spezia authored
The Template objects are supposed to be goroutine-safe once they have been parsed. This includes the text and html ones. For html/template, the escape mechanism is triggered at execution time. It may alter the internal structures of the template, so a mutex protects them against concurrent accesses. The text/template package is free of any synchronization primitive. A race condition may occur when nested templates are escaped: the escape algorithm alters the function maps of the associated text templates, while a concurrent template execution may access the function maps in read mode. The less invasive fix I have found is to introduce a RWMutex in text/template to protect the function maps. This is unfortunate but it should be effective. Fixes #9945 Change-Id: I1edb73c0ed0f1fcddd2f1516230b548b92ab1269 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10101Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
- 15 May, 2015 8 commits
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: I40e8a4a2e62253233b66f6a2e61e222437292c31 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10151Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
This allows the removal of a fudge in data.go. We have to defer the calls to adddynlib on non-Darwin until after we have decided whether we are externally or internally linking. The Macho/ELF separation could do with some cleaning up, but: code freeze. Fixing this once rather than per-arch is what inspired the previous CLs. Change-Id: I0166f7078a045dc09827745479211247466c0c54 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10002 Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
The only essential difference is elf32 vs elf64, I assume the other differences are bugs in one version or another... Change-Id: Ie6ff33d5574a6592b543df9983eff8fdf88c97a1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10001 Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Michael Hudson-Doyle authored
They were all essentially the same. Change-Id: I6e0b548cda6e4bbe2ec3b3025b746d1f6d332d48 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10000 Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Change-Id: Ic064fe7c6bd3304dcc8c3f7b3b5393870b5387c2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10119 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
This is an automated follow-up to CL 10120. It was generated with a combination of eg and gofmt -r. No functional changes. Passes toolstash -cmp. Change-Id: I0dc6d146372012b4cce9cc4064066daa6694eee6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10144Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Alex A Skinner authored
The previous implementation spawned an extra goroutine to handle rechecking resolv.conf for changes. This change eliminates the extra goroutine, and has rechecking done as part of a lookup. A side effect of this change is that the first lookup after a resolv.conf change will now succeed, whereas previously it would have failed. It also fixes rechecking logic to ignore resolv.conf parsing errors as it should. Fixes #8652 Fixes #10576 Fixes #10649 Fixes #10650 Fixes #10845 Change-Id: I502b587c445fa8eca5207ca4f2c8ec8c339fec7f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9991 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Fixes #8940. Change-Id: Ie9e5149983518ba8d56ddd82ac8f4cde6b644167 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10089Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
-